‹ The Differences - Canada, Europe … and America ? •
I wrote a short blog post about a year or so ago, when social networking software …. the likes of LinkedIn, Ryze, Ecademy, Orkut, Friendster, Tribe, and so on … was all the rage. I thought that while those offerings and their capabilities were all nifty-like, what would work for me (and, I suspected, many others) was blogging, me being my normal sometimes-confused, sometimes-clear, sometimes-smart, sometimes-clueless me on my blog … writing and linking about things that interested me, issues that perplexed, frustrated and inspired me.
I thought that finding and exploring my own voice would help me eventually find other people that also were interested and interesting. I thought that this process might let people start conversations with me (and vice-versa) that were more important and ultimately more honestly useful than swapping contacts and trying to get the combination of my past jobs and titles, plus my interests in music and books, “just right” … so that I could find a new job or make a deal. I found that too cold, linear and frankly, one-dimensional.
For me, this blogging thing has worked well. In a year and a half or so, via blogging, I have made many friendships that I think and feel are real, and are mutually respectful, growthful and beneficial … in the Netherlands, in France, in the UK, in the USA, in Canada and elsewhere … and in some cases I suspect that these friendships will lead to enduring collaborations.
This makes sense to me. Blogging is, I think, the online process that mimics how we converse and engage in the real 3D world, AND it has some useful supplementary aspects. For example, much has been said and written about the absence of “body language” in blogging … and with this I agree. Body language helps us greatly to interpret and understand what someone else is trying to communicate. However … with blogs, one can go back to a post and read it, several times if needed or desired. One can sit and think, and muse about responding or not … one can grab a post and work with it, adding some thoughts, some facts, some links (Doc Searls has called this process “the scaffolding of meaning”). One can also send posts or comments to posts, to others .. via email, or work it into an essay, a research paper, a business plan. The information spreads itself around … and helps to create understanding, meaning and sense. It also clearly creates real and tangible connections between people … that this is happening is clearly obvious.
This process … active on several levels … also helps people build trust and credibility in this online environment. There are many examples of conflicting perspectives and voices … often called trolls on blogs where a particular point of view is espoused,elaborated and reinforced. I think trolls are an essential part of creating better, deeper, more widely shared meaning … they provide a wall, a fixed point of refernce against which to bounce meaning, explanations, better or more comprehensive facts. One also comes to find and know blogs that are interesting, relevant, useful .. and in reading them, and perhaps commenting form time to time, we get a clear sense of the commitment (to a point of view, or to openness, or …) of a blogger. Our interaction and interpretation of that blog, or another blog, also helps us get a sense of those mostly intangible but oh-so important attributes of trust and credibility.
All this is much like having, and working at, meaningful and enduring conversations and dialogue in the offline world … the process of human discourse .. and this is where and how trust, credibility and reputation are built. And those attributes are what make “social networking” work for people … helping them accomplish what they need or want to do, with other people, in this oh-so-social world.
Doc Searls points us to a new search engine today … IceRocket, a search engine that searches blogs for exact phrases and also has a “Find a Firend” feature (disclaimer: I have only looked at the home page, and have not yet tried it).
What I also believe is very interesting about blogging, social networking, and the ongoing evolution of semantic and collaborative technology - the enablers of human conversation - is that technology such as Icerocket will help us find and evaluate what others are saying and doing on their blogs, and so enhance the process of finding like and different-minded folks, enhance the process of listening and of using voice to create connection and meaning.
And that, I think, is a good thing, in a world that is rapidly changing because of information, technology, interconnectedness, the accumulated experience and consequences of all that has gone before, and troublesome complexity.
I’ll keep on blogging. I have long since stopped even looking at my LinkedIn connections, and I haven’t looked at Orkut for probably nine months. In the spirit of my point of view, I probably should go and look around, and see what’s happening there, since I keep on telling myself that I am open-minded and dedicated to learning. I should practice what I prognosticate.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/10/13/blogging-as-active-social-networking-part-2/trackback/
October 13, 2004 at 1:37 pm
Anonymous
One of the key points in favor of blogging as social networking is the opt in nature. One needn’t post a comment and one can withdraw at any point. It’s anarchic, and that means most relationships will be formed on the basis of good will and the *real * content of others’ thinking. Appearance doesn’t matter.
Another is the sense of providing and visiting a virtual bar/living room/bordello parlor
for discussions. Most of the bloggers and commentors I know put an effort into being good hosts and guests. Group blogs are an exercise in collaborative explication.
The whole thing looks very promising to me. It’s no more a waste of time than chat at a cafe or bar and, at it’s best, can lead to cooperative social ventures. If we can get more computers to people who can’t afford them and get areas wired for access, as Gerry Gleason has mentioned, a vibrant democratic exchange is possible. There are people who have been marginalized who deserve a hearing. And we can always troll those who have gotten a hearing they don’t deserve ;p.
October 13, 2004 at 2:12 pm
Anonymous
You got it … you call it anarchic, I think I prefer self-organizing, based on affinity, trust, credibility, etc.
October 13, 2004 at 4:16 pm
Anonymous
Anarchism gets a bad rap. Probably thanks in equal parts to propaganda and the poseurs who think it means complete license. The classic defintion of it what you just said, with fully participatory democracy as the means of setting up ethical codes. I don’t know if it’s possible for countries to organize along those lines, but blogs can make a stab at it :-).
October 13, 2004 at 8:01 pm
Anonymous
Yeah … you and I know that … rigourously speaking, it’s the absence of structure, which doesn’t mean chaos … it means the opportunity to find right structure, dependent upon the environment … and not necessarily just the situation, viz. situational leadership.
October 13, 2004 at 8:10 pm
Anonymous
I think you’re right, that blogging is social networking. At the very least, linking to other bloggers, the comments feature and blogrolls serve that definition. What Rojo is doing will further strengthen the similarity if it catches on. What concerns me about the future of blogging is what Danah Boyd wrote about a couple of days ago, and that’s the disconnect between what the younger generation is interested in (live interaction) and the present state of the blogging medium, which has no real mechanism of live interaction. With the advent of real-time aggregators, real-time matching engines like PubSub, and real-time alerts when comments are posted to blogs, the gap may narrow to the point that you can converse with your audience in real-time, but that hasn’t happened yet, and I feel needs to before blogging will become less a one-way public diary/news/opinion medium into a two-way messaging/social medium. My $.02.
Allen Searls
http://wondir.blogspot.com
http://www.Wondir.com
October 13, 2004 at 8:23 pm
Anonymous
Something I think that is much overlooked is the developmental process and work (self-and-other) done in the action of blogging. You have to hhave some sort … your own style, aesthetic of critical thinking, and listening to self an others, and then a palette and canvas with which to express … wirtten and visually.
That process is inherently creative, and to be creative is to be human. It’s also social, in groping for how to express yourself in ways that are accessible to others. Some don’t care about that accessibility, and that is where there is both crap and genius, true art.
We’re all finding ourselves and each other in this new medium.
October 13, 2004 at 8:45 pm
Anonymous
Didn’t finish my thought, above.
And this may be a vast generalization, as I know that there are many very bright, curious and engaged young people … but what may be worrisome over time, and as a culture, is a slowly reducing intimate engagement on the part of the coming generations with the wrtten word and the process of writing.
This may be crap on my part, because of course the Web is much about writing and text, and has given many many people a whole new (and much more interesting) playing field.
If anyone has interesting sources of information, additional research, book sthat address this specific issue, i’d love to know more. I imagine people like Sherry Turkle, Manuel Castells and Jeremy Rifkin have thought about and researched this area.