<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wirearchy &#187; 2004 &#187; December &#187; 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com</link>
	<description>You know more than me, we know more than you, and wherever this all going, we're going there together.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Someone Working On An Early Version Of &#8220;Wirearchy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/someone-working-on-an-early-version-of-wirearchy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/someone-working-on-an-early-version-of-wirearchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/someone-working-on-an-early-version-of-wirearchy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got this via email as a member of a yahoo group focused on Shoshana Zuboff&#8217;s concept of the support economy.
Michael Wolff of ki-work.com has been thinking about organizations, knowledge work, customer service, distributed newtorks and offshoring.
Here&#8217;s his email:
Following Tom Peters offshoring manifesto in which he says that off-
shoring is here to stay and he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this via email as a member of a yahoo group focused on <a href="http://www.thesupporteconomy.com">Shoshana Zuboff&#8217;s concept of the support economy</a>.</p>
<p>Michael Wolff of <a href="http://www.ki-work.com">ki-work.com</a> has been thinking about organizations, knowledge work, customer service, distributed newtorks and offshoring.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s his email:</p>
<p><em>Following Tom Peters offshoring manifesto in which he says that off-</p>
<p>shoring is here to stay and he lists 20 &#8220;hard truths&#8221; in support of</p>
<p>the view in Changethis.com (www.changethis.com/7.OffShoringManifesto),</p>
<p>Graham Douglas challenged us to respond with our ki work offshoring</p>
<p>manifesto.</p>
<p>Drawing heavily on TSE thinking, we submit a draft for your</p>
<p>comments. Our position is that while we accept the inevitablity of</p>
<p>off-shoring, especially in manufacturing and to some extent in IT,</p>
<p>we do not see this as appropriate for knowledge work. New</p>
<p>organisational structures are required. The following is our 19</p>
<p>point manifesto. We are allowing Tom Peters to win by having more</p>
<p>points!</p>
<p>the challenge</p>
<p>in the emergent knowledge economy, the mechanistic command and</p>
<p>control organisational model that was suitable for manufacturing</p>
<p>goods and location-dependent services is clearly not working for</p>
<p>services that are delivered via IT and telecoms.</p>
<p>these services are being undertaken in contact and admin centres,</p>
<p>which are, essentially, knowledge factories. Based on transaction</p>
<p>economics, the goal is to optimise the cost and productivity of</p>
<p>every transaction, without full regard for the impact on customers</p>
<p>and workers. As a result:</p>
<p>- there is a growing chasm between companies and their customers,</p>
<p>illustrated by the decline in customer loyalty</p>
<p>- workers are becoming increasingly less fulfilled in their work, as</p>
<p>reflected in the growing levels of staff turnover</p>
<p>- in the banking sector, insider crime rates are soaring as more and</p>
<p>more short term staff are employed</p>
<p>there is a progressive breakdown in trust between companies and</p>
<p>their customers and workers. With the growth in offshoring, the gap</p>
<p>between the company and its customers widens further. The</p>
<p>relationship between the company and its onshore employees is also</p>
<p>further stressed.</p>
<p>with growing dissatisfaction from both customers and employees, the</p>
<p>risks posed by applying an outmoded organisational model with a</p>
<p>narrow focus on minimising the cost per transaction are compounded,</p>
<p>leading eventually to serious negative outcomes for all stakeholders.</p>
<p><strong>to meet this challenge, ki work proposes a radical restructuring of</p>
<p>the conventional organisational model, in favour of one that</p>
<p>recognises and is based on the value of a company&#8217;s relationships,</p>
<p>both with its customers and its workers.</strong></p>
<p>ki work manifesto</p>
<p>1.&#160;&#160; ki work is an innovative organisational structure facilitating</p>
<p>collaborative and transactional interactions between workers and</p>
<p>customers, mediated by IT and telecoms</p>
<p>2.&#160;&#160; ki work supports the large scale distribution of interactive,</p>
<p>collaborative decision-making and transaction processing &#8211; typically</p>
<p>contact centre, admin and knowledge-intensive applications</p>
<p>3.&#160;&#160; ki work is a cost-competitive, socially responsible and</p>
<p>sustainable alternative to offshoring</p>
<p>4.&#160;&#160; ki work is a self-organising, adaptive, non-linear, and complex</p>
<p>social network. This entails a radical realignment in working</p>
<p>relationships, from the dominant competitive to the emergent</p>
<p>collaborative mode of consciousness &#8211; from collaborating to compete</p>
<p>to competing to collaborate</p>
<p>5.&#160;&#160; ki work supports the balanced creation of financial,</p>
<p>relationship, social and environmental capital, enabling a quantum</p>
<p>shift from transaction to relationship economics</p>
<p>6.&#160;&#160; ki work minimises organisational and infrastructure overheads,</p>
<p>and maximises process efficiency, enabling ki workers to earn most</p>
<p>of the total interaction value by keeping costs low</p>
<p>7.&#160;&#160; ki work is a purpose-centred and principle-based community -</p>
<p>the common purpose that all members share is to realise the power of</p>
<p>collaborative networking on an equitable basis for all members and</p>
<p>to create and share financial, relationship, social and</p>
<p>environmental capital</p>
<p>8.&#160;&#160; ki work and its members are custodians, not owners of capital -</p>
<p>the shared intellectual property belongs to the ki work commons</p>
<p>9.&#160;&#160; ki work is a collaborative organisational layer that</p>
<p>interconnects workers both inside and outside conventional</p>
<p>organisations, focused on cross-functional and customer-focused</p>
<p>processes across permeable organisational boundaries</p>
<p>10.&#160; ki work recognises that each collaborative and transactional</p>
<p>interaction between two or more individuals supporting a business</p>
<p>process is unique, exceptional and potentially transformational</p>
<p>11. in the ki work network, the centre of the organisational</p>
<p>universe is the interaction between two or more individuals, whether</p>
<p>they are ki workers or not. This enables organisations to build</p>
<p>trust with both customers and workers, compounding the growth in</p>
<p>relationship capital. This in turn results in massively increased</p>
<p>productivity, flexibility and adaptability</p>
<p>12.&#160; in the ki work model every interaction is an opportunity to</p>
<p>share information, knowledge, emotion, wisdom and transformational</p>
<p>opportunities, providing ki workers a path to self-actualisation</p>
<p>through the sustainable development of self-knowledge and</p>
<p>authenticity through the development of deep working relationships</p>
<p>13.&#160; in the emergent knowledge economy, knowledge and its means of</p>
<p>transfer are abundant - what are scarce and have value are deep</p>
<p>relationships</p>
<p>14.&#160; purpose-centred collaborative networks are massively scalable</p>
<p>and accelerate the development of relationship capital, following</p>
<p>Reed&#8217;s law of exponential growth on the value of networks</p>
<p>15.&#160; the ki work relationship model is responsive and empowering,</p>
<p>shifting from the traditional employer/employee and customer/service</p>
<p>provider relationship in favour of peer-to-peer and mutual</p>
<p>interdependence</p>
<p>16.&#160; empowered workers are more than capable (with the appropriate</p>
<p>environment and training) to manage themselves, to agree outcomes</p>
<p>with other team members, and to deliver those outcomes, even when</p>
<p>working from home. This self-organisation contributes to the low</p>
<p>cost of the ki work model</p>
<p>17.&#160; people flourish, grow, succeed, and are more fulfilled when</p>
<p>part of a supportive community with shared purpose, values and</p>
<p>goals, and where their contribution makes a difference</p>
<p>18.&#160; when part of a community of practice, the potential for</p>
<p>collaborative learning, creating and sharing new knowledge, and</p>
<p>finding innovative solutions, rises exponentially</p>
<p>19.&#160; ki work supports an integral home and community-centric</p>
<p>approach to work-life balance. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/someone-working-on-an-early-version-of-wirearchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Blogging Can Do For A Post-Dilbert Workplace &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/what-blogging-can-do-for-a-post-dilbert-workplace/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/what-blogging-can-do-for-a-post-dilbert-workplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/what-blogging-can-do-for-a-post-dilbert-workplace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; over on Gaping Void, I noticed either a blog ad or a new type of link, over to what looks like a blog, more than a site.
SlackerManager.com - Paving The Path Of Least Resistance, So You Don&#8217;t Trip And Fall
Blogging meets Dilbert in the Post-9/11 Era ?
The tag line makes sense when you read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; over on <a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com">Gaping Void</a>, I noticed either a blog ad or a new type of link, over to what looks like a blog, more than a site.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slackermanager.com">SlackerManager.com - Paving The Path Of Least Resistance, So You Don&#8217;t Trip And Fall</a></p>
<p>Blogging meets Dilbert in the Post-9/11 Era ?</p>
<p>The tag line makes sense when you read it, almost.  But then, I found myself thinking &#8230; if it&#8217;s the path of least resistance, who cares if you fall &#8230; you&#8217;ll probably roll into something even less resistant, and it might be fun - warm, wet, soft, easy on the touch &#8230; whatever.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll look around, and see what it has to say.  I am so very jaded about workplace stuff  &#8230; witty observations, more prescriptions and nostrums about high performance, and engagement, and execution, and leadership, and bottom-up managing upward, and authenticity, and hot groups, and innovation, and creativity.</p>
<p>I believe I have a good reason for being jaded. This domain was my career focus for 20 years, and a passion for most of those 20 years (and arguably, when thinking and writing about wirearchy, the sociology of technology, and the dynamics of intercognilinked communications &#8230; it still may be).  I have boxes and boxes of books in my storage lockers on self-directed teams, role and power negotiations in the workplace, organizational design, organizational change and development, spirituality at work, leadership, the future of organizations.  I&#8217;ve been a presenter about issues such as organizational effectiveness, work design, and the &#8220;workplace of the future&#8221; at national and international conferences in three or four countries.</p>
<p>From a cynical point of view, I could say that the more there has been an emphasis on performance and competition, the more it has been an excuse for many (most ?) organizations to become more darwinian, meaner if not leaner, more conservative and risk-averse, and more narrow, more rigid  &#8230; even though one wcould argue that the demands of our current environment make it necessary, critical even, that organizations become more cooperative and collaborative, educated players-with-risk, and seeking to engrain flexibility as a way of life, a central defining factor of culture.</p>
<p>I am jealous, in a way, of the people in their early &#8217;20&#8217;s through to mid-to-late 30&#8217;s, in that they at least get to be realistic, sardonic, sarcastic, intelligent, and so on &#8220;slackers&#8221; because it&#8217;s at least evident in 2004 that life is more often than not NOT the monotonic, black and white, heterosexual couple, two kids and a house fairy tale, the work-your-way-up-the-ladder for 20 years and you&#8217;ll be alright beliefs.   Sure, those scenarios still unfold for many people in different ways or via different paths, but at least we don&#8217;t pretend as much about that area of life any more.   We do pretend about lots of other stuff, though &#8230; you can probably pick just as many areas as me.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I imagine that there are many 20-something to 30-somethings out there that think I must be nuts or out of touch with their lives, given that there&#8217;s still so much of the old-school, established institutions mindset still in power &#8230; and no doubt many of them have a very harried, difficult set of circumstances to navigate and manage.   For them I have a lot of empathy, and I still sometimes feel a responsibility to keep pushing for more openness in organizational/workplace areas and issues.  Work and making one&#8217;s contributions are central aspects of peoples&#8217; lives, and there&#8217;s an inherent, ongoing struggle between the demands made on organizations by the rules of the commercial/business game, and the demands made on individuals - physically, psychologically and emotionally - by organizations in order to succeed at the business game.</p>
<p>I can often understand why intelligent people become slackers, or why the &#8220;slacker ethic&#8221; as I understand it, exists &#8230; why encourage this system by getting empassioned about corporate performance when the system is badly out of whack, and not doing you any favours ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/10/what-blogging-can-do-for-a-post-dilbert-workplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
