<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wirearchy &#187; 2004 &#187; December</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com</link>
	<description>You know more than me, we know more than you, and wherever this all going, we're going there together.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>End of Year Testing IV</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-iv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Powered By Qumana
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV><IMG SRC="http://entertainment.sympatico.msn.ca/NR/rdonlyres/C2D600A7-CD72-448A-A29C-228D0863D651/16240/maria300.jpg" ALT="maria300.jpg"></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endof Year Testing III</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/endof-year-testing-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/endof-year-testing-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/endof-year-testing-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow !&#160;Step 1 &#8230; find picture on page&#160;Step 2 &#8230; if link, click on it &#8230; drill down to where the picture &#8220;is&#8221;&#160;Step 3 &#8230; drag to Qumana and drop&#160;Step 4 &#8230;. double-click to open editor, then post &#8230; that&#8217;s it, that&#8217;s all !!&#160;Happy New Year&#160;Powered By Qumana
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV>Wow !</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Step 1 &#8230; find picture on page</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Step 2 &#8230; if link, click on it &#8230; drill down to where the picture &#8220;is&#8221;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Step 3 &#8230; drag to Qumana and drop</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Step 4 &#8230;. double-click to open editor, then post &#8230; that&#8217;s it, that&#8217;s all !!</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT color=#ffff00 size=6>Happy</FONT></EM></STRONG> <EM><STRONG><FONT color=#00a800 size=4>New</FONT></STRONG></EM> <FONT face=Symbol color=#d50000 size=5><STRONG>Year</STRONG></FONT></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><IMG SRC="http://entertainment.sympatico.msn.ca/NR/rdonlyres/C2D600A7-CD72-448A-A29C-228D0863D651/16238/drake300.jpg" ALT="drake300.jpg"></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/endof-year-testing-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of Year Testing II</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found myself immediately wanting ( and thus missing) Qumana&#8217;s style sheets, since they make it really easy to dress things up in ways that previously have been too much trouble to try to learn.&#160;But this WYSIWYG capability is delightful to have right at handPowered By Qumana
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV>Found myself immediately wanting ( and thus <FONT color=#0080ff size=5><EM><STRONG>missing) </STRONG></EM><FONT face="Comic Sans MS" color=#000000><FONT size=3><EM><STRONG>Qumana&#8217;s </STRONG></EM><FONT face="Arial Black"><STRONG><EM>style</EM> sheets</STRONG>, since they make </FONT><FONT face=Century>it <U>really easy</U> to dress </FONT><FONT face=Sylfaen>things up </FONT><FONT face=Roman>in ways that previously have been <STRONG><FONT color=#9f009f>too much trouble to try to learn.</FONT></STRONG></FONT></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV><DIV><STRONG><FONT face=Roman color=#9f009f></FONT></STRONG>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><STRONG><FONT face=Roman color=#00ffff>But <FONT face="Trebuchet MS">this W<FONT color=#ff0000>Y</FONT><FONT color=#00ff00>S</FONT><FONT color=#000080>I</FONT><FONT color=#800000>W</FONT><FONT color=#0000ff>Y</FONT><FONT color=#ff0000>G </FONT><FONT face=Univers color=#000000>capability is delightful <EM><U>to have right at hand</U></EM></FONT></FONT></FONT></STRONG></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End Of Year Testing</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just gotten my PC back &#8230; and I&#8217;ve just installed Qumana LE.&#160;It really is now the simplest way from higlighting and dargging microcontent to publishing it on your blog.&#160;Drag n&#8217; blog.&#160; Doubleclick, type, then post.&#160; Wow !&#160;I honestly can&#8217;t conceive of how it might get any easier than this (also testing WYSIWYG)&#160;I am not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV>I&#8217;ve just gotten my PC back &#8230; and I&#8217;ve just installed Qumana LE.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>It really is now the simplest way from higlighting and dargging microcontent to publishing it on your blog.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Drag n&#8217; blog.&nbsp; Doubleclick, type, then post.&nbsp; Wow !</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I honestly can&#8217;t conceive of how it might get any easier than this (<FONT color=#00ff00 size=5>also</FONT> <EM><STRONG><U><FONT face=Tahoma color=#ff0000>testing</FONT></U></STRONG></EM> <STRONG><U>WYSIWYG</U></STRONG>)<HR><HR></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I am not aware of any blog editor or blog client that functions as easily, and that has as many accessible features.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Here&#8217;s to 2005.</DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/31/end-of-year-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogs, MSN Spaces, Scoble, Gates &#8230;. Fortune Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/28/blogs-msn-spaces-scoble-gates-fortune-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/28/blogs-msn-spaces-scoble-gates-fortune-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/28/blogs-msn-spaces-scoble-gates-fortune-magazine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article on blogs &#8230; an extract
When it came to the criticism emanating from Boing Boing, Scoble simply&#8230; agreed. &#8220;MSN Spaces isn&#8217;t the blogging service for me,&#8221; he wrote. Nobody at Microsoft asked Scoble to comment; he just did it on his own, adding that he would make sure that the team working on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting <a href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,1011763,00.html">article on blogs</a> &#8230; an extract</p>
<p><em>When it came to the criticism emanating from Boing Boing, Scoble simply&#8230; agreed. &#8220;MSN Spaces isn&#8217;t the blogging service for me,&#8221; he wrote. Nobody at Microsoft asked Scoble to comment; he just did it on his own, adding that he would make sure that the team working on Spaces was aware of the complaints. And he kept revisiting the issue on his blog.</p>
<p>As the anti-Microsoft crowd cried censorship, the nearly 4,000 blogs linking to Scoble were able to see his running commentary on how Microsoft was reacting. &#8220;I get comments on my blog saying, &#8216;I didn&#8217;t like Microsoft before, but at least they&#8217;re listening to us,&#8217;&#8221; says Scoble. &#8220;The blog is the best relationship generator you&#8217;ve ever seen.&#8221; His famous boss agrees.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;It&#8217;s all about openness,&#8221; says chairman Bill Gates of Microsoft&#8217;s public blogs like Scobleizer. &#8220;People see them as a reflection of an open, communicative culture that isn&#8217;t afraid to be self-critical.&#8221;</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/28/blogs-msn-spaces-scoble-gates-fortune-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Precious For Words &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/24/too-precious-for-words/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/24/too-precious-for-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/24/too-precious-for-words/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; and musical stylings by Harry
The President on his way to some other shafting.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and musical stylings by <a href="http://pierrotsfolly.blogspot.com">Harry</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pierrotsfolly.blogspot.com/2004/12/makes-me-nostalgic-evil-midi.html">The President on his way to some other shafting.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/24/too-precious-for-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments &#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/23/comments/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/23/comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/23/comments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. offer up some pearls now and then.
One commenter over on Washington Monthly, a progressive blog, cuts through much of what&#8217;s going on to offer some short and sweet advice on major policy revisions.
Given that the current situation has been more or less developing ever since the founding of Israel (actually before that), it&#8217;s not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. offer up some pearls now and then.</p>
<p>One commenter over on Washington Monthly, a progressive blog, cuts through much of what&#8217;s going on to offer some short and sweet advice on major policy revisions.</p>
<p>Given that the current situation has been more or less developing ever since the founding of Israel (actually before that), it&#8217;s not likely that the current US administration will implement this advice any time soon.</p>
<p>I believe histroy will show us, one day, that this would have been the way to go &#8230; starting yesterday.</p>
<p><em>- Get off oil</p>
<p>- Put our boots on Israel&#8217;s neck</p>
<p>- and start really educating our kids.</p>
<p>China and India are gonna kick our butts if we don&#8217;t get moving RIGHT NOW.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s NEW THINKING.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/23/comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Important perspective &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/an-important-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/an-important-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/an-important-perspective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8230; from a non-North American whom I trust to be thoughtful &#8230; Dina Mehta.  I&#8217;ve been reading her material for a couple of years now, and know that she is thoiughtful and considered.
She was comparing, and trying to understand, some comments received in response to Arundhati Roy&#8217;s very critical examination of recent Bush Administration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
&#8230; from a non-North American whom I trust to be thoughtful &#8230; <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0121664/">Dina Mehta</a>.  I&#8217;ve been reading her material for a couple of years now, and know that she is thoiughtful and considered.</p>
<p>She was comparing, and trying to understand, some comments received in response to Arundhati Roy&#8217;s very critical examination of recent Bush Administration doings in Iraq.  Some of the commenters were very heated in their criticisms of Roy, and suggested Roy was a terrorist, rather than Bush.  This type of logic seems similar to much of what I observe going on in the U.S., with real divisiveness continuing to grow as any criticism of Bushco&#8217;s grand adventures is typoically turned upside down &#8230; the critics are told that they &#8220;hate freedom&#8221;, or don&#8217;t appreciate Dubya&#8217;s far-seeing wisdom (I am so tired of the continued use of the phrase &#8220;history will show whether Bush is right or not&#8221;  &#8230; that can be said about absolutely anything, and is NOT in any way a logical support for having invaded Iraq.</p>
<p>Apropos <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0121664/2004/11/25.html#a528">Dina&#8217;s (longer) post here</a>, I have read much of Arundhati Roy&#8217;s recent work, and readers will know that I have no fondness whatsoever for George Bush.</p>
<p>I found <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0121664/2004/11/25.html#a528">the points of view she has uncovered, and her subsequent exploration of them</a>, very interesting to read and think about.  Thanks, Dina.</p>
<p>Am excerpt from her longer blog post:</p>
<p><em>Its interesting to see how there seems to be a blurring here of who the aggressor is and who the victim. And who is to blame - the perpetrators of atrocities resulting from war or the initiators of the war itself ? And finally who is a terrorist or an enablor of terrorists ? Bush as Arundhati Roy says &#8230; or Arundhati Roy as Shanthi suggests ?&#160;</p>
<p>I am curious like some of the other commenters at her post about several issues.&#160;&#160;I asked some questions - where did you get the impression that Arundhati Roy supported the killers of Margaret Hassan ? And what&#160;in your perception makes her a terrorist-enabler ? Is that just a counter-argument to her calling Bush a terrorist at some point in time? And more basic - am terribly curious to know why you hate her so ? What harm is she doing ? And at a broader level, is there a subliminal link between those that hate her and those that are pro-Bush (never mind for now about pro-BJP) ?&#160;</p>
<p>I digress here, but in comparison, it must be said that many Indians i know feel Bush is a terrorist - and many others around the world do too.&#160;&#160; That Bush should be tried in a world court for his atrocities.&#160; I wonder what or who gave him the right to become the watchdog for the world ? To decide for the people of Iraq&#160;that war is better than Saddam ? Or that Iraq will be better without him ? Or the audacity to wage war per se ? No guerilla attack like so-called terrorists wage - but blatant massacre nonetheless, a more despicable form of in-your-face terrorism. Is there&#160;justification for the world&#8217;s largest super-power world going on a witchhunt in the middle-east ?&#160; Cleansing again ?&#160;&#160;</p>
<p>Frightening.</p>
<p>And if the people of Iraq resist this invasion are they terrorists ? Or are they victims who are resisting terrorist attacks ? And what is wrong in Arundhati Roy&#160;saying - &#8220;One wasn&#8217;t urging them to join the army, but to become the resistance, to become part of what ought to be non-violent resistance against a very violent occupation,&#8221; she said, adding that the term resistance needed to be redefined. &#8220;We can&#8217;t assume that resistance means terrorism because that would be playing right into the hands of the occupation,&#8221; she said&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/an-important-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jakob Nielsen on Online Advertising</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/jakob-nielsen-on-online-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/jakob-nielsen-on-online-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/jakob-nielsen-on-online-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online Advertising
Jakob Nielsen talks of the The Most Hated Advertising Techniques&#160;:
&#8220;Summary : studies of how people react to online advertisements have identified several design techniques that impact the user experience very negatively. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;
Lessons for Websites :
Sites that accept advertising should think twice before accepting ads that 80 to 90% of users strongly dislike. The resulting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online Advertising</p>
<p>Jakob Nielsen talks of the The Most Hated Advertising Techniques&#160;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Summary : studies of how people react to online advertisements have identified several design techniques that impact the user experience very negatively. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Lessons for Websites :</p>
<p>Sites that accept advertising should think twice before accepting ads that 80 to 90% of users strongly dislike. The resulting drop in customer satisfaction will damage your long-term prospects.</p>
<p>How Not To Advertise Online</p>
<p>Advertisers themselves might be tempted to continue with these nasty design techniques as long as they can find sites that will run them. After all, they typically yield higher clickthrough rates. But clickthrough is not the only goal. Users who are deceived into clicking on a misleading ad might drive up your CTR, but they&#8217;re unlikely to convert into paying customers. And your brand suffers a distinct negative impact when you antagonize customers and use techniques that are associated with the worst scum on the net.</p>
<p>Corporate websites can also learn from these studies, even if they don&#8217;t run ads. Many elements that users dislike in ad design are also common in mainstream Web design, with equally bad affects. A few things to avoid:</p>
<p>Pop-ups</p>
<p>Slow load times</p>
<p>&#8220;Teasing&#8221; links, misleading categories, and other elements that trick users into clicking</p>
<p>Content that doesn&#8217;t clearly state the site&#8217;s purpose or what a particular page covers</p>
<p>Content that moves around the page</p>
<p>Sound that plays automatically</p>
<p>All of these techniques have caused problems in traditional usability studies of non-advertising sites, and I&#8217;ve warned against them many times before. The fact that they&#8217;re associated with the most hated ads is one more reason that respectable sites should avoid them at all costs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/22/jakob-nielsen-on-online-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAP (Rapid Assembly Posting) - the Blogging World&#8217;s Answer to Rap Music</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/21/rap-rapid-assembly-posting-the-blogging-worlds-answer-to-rap-music/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/21/rap-rapid-assembly-posting-the-blogging-worlds-answer-to-rap-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/21/rap-rapid-assembly-posting-the-blogging-worlds-answer-to-rap-music/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugh Macleod of Gaping Void gets into one of the most interesting areas of impact the Web has on the intersection between creative work and the commercialization of content.
I think that this is what Wired was looking at with its recent issue that offered a free CD of music to use.
Is the interactive future inevitable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Macleod of Gaping Void gets into one of the most interesting areas of impact the Web has on <a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/001189.html">the intersection between creative work and the commercialization of content</a>.</p>
<p>I think that this is what Wired was looking at with its recent issue that offered a free CD of music to use.</p>
<p>Is the interactive future inevitable ?  I  think that&#8217;s the point of this recent post by Ming the Mechanic that highlights the issue that <a href="http://ming.tv/flemming2.php/__show_article/_a000010-001442.htm">15 lines of code in Python provides an effective P2P application</a> &#8230; can it ever be controlled from on high ?</p>
<p>Increasingly it will be a world of information that is constantly flowing, fed with original and re-mixed, re-combined bits and pieces of information.  Humans combining this bits and pieces will always be the final filter, as they take in the information and turn around and push info back out &#8230; publishing to a blog, or email, or to a file that will be saved in their own Personal Server.  A Personal Server will be a simple and easy to use &#8220;electronic filing cabinet&#8221; that accomodates both the diligent person&#8217;s need for structure and the ad-hoc nature of many peoples&#8217; inforaging habits.</p>
<p>From Gaping Void:</p>
<p><em>In a recent gapingvoid post, Microsoft employee/star blogger Robert Scoble asks the question about his employer:</p>
<p>Can we turn this aircraft carrier around? I don&#8217;t know, but I&#8217;m having fun trying!</p>
<p>Richard then counters with this point:</p>
<p>A collapsing empire or an aircraft carrier in search of a handbrake turn are both behemothic (mmm, neologism?). Open source trends (I include blogging in that - it&#8217;s open source publishing) can&#8217;t actually rescue them. Indeed, I propose a different analogy to either of you. Open source software and blogging are the small mammals to M$&#8217;s and big publishing&#8217;s dinosaurs. Even without the meteorite, the big lizards are doomed.</p>
<p>I work for a small publishing company, and the big question I&#8217;m trying to answer is one posed by Hugh and others a while back: how do you cope when bundled content is dead? What do those of use whose revenue model is bundled content and intermediation do five years from now when a generation of media consumers is used to creating their own bundles? M$ has the same question to answer: when software development doesn&#8217;t rely on big gangs of coders and creators and distributors and consultants - on overhead, basically - what then?</p>
<p>And then I pipe in:</p>
<p>Richard, good point. What you have illustrated is the often corrupting influence of taking your company public.</p>
<p>At least in the USA, a private company can go, &#8220;The goalposts have moved. Screw it. Move on. Build a new biz model which relies on 2,000 people, not 60,000. Have it up n&#8217; running by next Christmas&#8221;.</p>
<p>Because a public company is ALWAYS beholden to Wall Street, it cannot do that. It can only do stuff which is good for the next Quarter.</p>
<p>What is good for the business is not always good for Wall Street, and vice versa.</p>
<p>If MS does have a meteor, methinks it&#8217;s the same meteor that once happily gave Bill Gates billions of dollars. The one that will insist MS remain a large, cold-blooded lizard, and forbid it to change into a small, furry mammal.</p>
<p>If MS goes under, it will not be Open Source that puts MS out of business. MS&#8217;s owners (i.e. Wall Street) will put MS out of business.</p>
<p>Bill and his top management are extremely smart people. I&#8217;ll wager they already know all this, and already have a possible exit strategy well thought out. I&#8217;ll also wager Robert and people of similar rank at Microsoft have no earthly clue what it is.</p>
<p>But who knows. Predicting the future is a hazardous business. So is underestimating Microsoft.</em></p>
<p>Suffice it to say that two worlds are colliding here &#8230; a monopolistic outlook on personal-productivity software (Word, excel and Powerpoint) and the world where easy-to-use blogging tools and an increasingly effective infrastructural of link management are creating a new environment for creating and exchanging information.</p>
<p>No wonder Microsoft has come out with MSN Spaces.  This intersection - Microsoft personal productivity software and the capabilities for self-expression offered by blogs - is where the world will come to life on the Web over the next decade or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2004/12/21/rap-rapid-assembly-posting-the-blogging-worlds-answer-to-rap-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
