<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wirearchy &#187; 2005 &#187; January &#187; 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com</link>
	<description>You know more than me, we know more than you, and wherever this all going, we're going there together.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Phenomenal Internet&#8217;s Scope of Operations &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-internets-scope-of-operations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-internets-scope-of-operations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-internets-scope-of-operations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; permeates all aspects of our lives now, and so has formed an infrastructure of sorts.  That this is so poses a new form of risk, according to the first section of a Pew study of The Future of The Internet.  I have the pdf but not the link, and will be glad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; permeates all aspects of our lives now, and so has formed an infrastructure of sorts.  That this is so poses a new form of risk, according to the first section of a Pew study of The Future of The Internet.  I have the pdf but not the link, and will be glad to email it to anyone who asks &#8230; until I find the link and post it.</p>
<p><em>A broad-ranging survey of technology leaders, scholars, industry  officials, and interested members of the public finds that most experts  expect attacks on the network infrastructure in the coming decade. Some  argue that serious assaults on the internet infrastructure will become a  regular part of life.</p>
<p>In September 2004, the Pew Internet Project sent an email invitation to a list of respected  technology experts and social analysts, asking them to complete a 24-question survey  about the future of the internet. We also asked the initial group of experts to forward the  invitation to colleagues and friends who might provide interesting perspectives. Some  1,286 people responded to the online survey between September 20 and November 1,  2004. About half are internet pioneers and were online before 1993. Roughly a third of  the experts are affiliated with an academic institution and another third work for a  company or consulting firm. The rest are divided between non-profit organizations,  publications, and the government.</p>
<p>This survey finds there is a strong across-the-board consensus that the internet will  become so important to users in the coming decade that the network itself will become an  inviting target for attack. By a nearly 3-1 margin, the experts in this survey expressed  worry about the vulnerability of the internet and the likelihood of an attack on the  underlying infrastructure within the next ten years.   Some 66% agreed with the following prediction: At least one devastating attack will  occur in the next 10 years on the networked information infrastructure or the  country&#8217;s power grid. As one expert wrote, &#8220;A simple scan of the growing number and  growing sophistication of the viral critters already populating our networks is ample  evidence of the capacity and motivation to disrupt.&#8221; Eleven percent disagreed with the  prediction and 7% challenged it, including some who argued that they did not expect any  attack to be serious enough to involve loss of life or a very long outage.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-internets-scope-of-operations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Phenomenal U.S. Military&#8217;s Scope of Operations &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-us-militarys-scope-of-operations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-us-militarys-scope-of-operations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-us-militarys-scope-of-operations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8230;. reaches around the world. 
From a longer piece in Mother Jones about the accumulated effects of the power and reach of the current administration&#8217;s ideology.&#160;Indeed. The military has become not&#160;&#160;just our war-fighting and occupying force, but our main &#8220;nation-building&#8221; force, our major diplomatic force (now that military-to-military relations have become the essence of foreign [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV>
<p>&#8230;. reaches around the world. </p>
<p><P>From a longer piece in Mother Jones about <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/news/dailymojo/2005/01/01_503.html">the accumulated effects of the power and reach </A>of the current administration&#8217;s ideology.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P><EM>Indeed. The military has become not&nbsp;&nbsp;just our war-fighting and occupying force, but our main &#8220;nation-building&#8221; force, our major diplomatic force (now that military-to-military relations have become the essence of foreign policy), our preponderant intelligence force, a major propaganda outfit (or call it public diplomacy, if you will), our central ministry for advanced R&amp;D research and basic science, </EM>                                                          <a href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,582584-1,00.html"><u><FONT COLOR="#0000ff"><EM>the only part of the government</EM>     </FONT></u></A><EM> seriously preparing for a global-warming world, and our planetary rescue outfit as well &#8212; to name just a few of its roles. With more clearly to come.</EM> </P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/the-phenomenal-us-militarys-scope-of-operations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same Issue, No ?  &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/same-issue-no/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/same-issue-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/same-issue-no/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; as mentioned in the previous post.&#160; I grabbed the points below off Dave Winers&#8217;s blog today.&#160;Rogers Cadenhead: &#8220;Unlike every other mass medium, the Web doesn&#8217;t let giant corporations hog the mike.&#8221; Good point.&#160;&#160;To Rogers, therein lies the basis for my 2002 thesis that monoculture may be an artifact of the 20th century.&#160;Powered By Qumana
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV><P>&#8230; as mentioned in the previous post.&nbsp; </P><P>I grabbed the points below off <a href="http://www.scripting.com">Dave Winers&#8217;s blog </A>today.</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P><a href="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/entry/2005/01/11.html#2435">Rogers Cadenhead</A>: &#8220;Unlike every other mass medium, the Web doesn&#8217;t let giant corporations hog the mike.&#8221; <I>Good point.</I>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://archive.scripting.com/2005/01/11#When:9:26:11AM"><IMG height=9 alt="Permanent link to this item in the archive." src="http://www.scripting.com/images/2001/09/20/sharpPermaLink3.gif" width=6 border=0></A></P><P><A name=When:9:36:18AM></A>To Rogers, therein lies the basis for my 2002 thesis that <a href="http://davenet.scripting.com/2002/05/13/monocultureAnArtifcactOfThe20thCentury">monoculture</A> may be an artifact of the 20th century.</P><P>&nbsp;</P></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/11/same-issue-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
