<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wirearchy &#187; 2005 &#187; January &#187; 18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com</link>
	<description>You know more than me, we know more than you, and wherever this all going, we're going there together.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Obvious ?  Focuses and Amplifies &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/the-obvious-focuses-and-amplifies/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/the-obvious-focuses-and-amplifies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/the-obvious-focuses-and-amplifies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Euan picked up a sound bite (below) from one of the 10 Principles with which I&#8217;m experimenting (as in looking for feedback).
He picked an interesting one.&#160; I&#8217;d argue that without the genius of the thousands and thousands of people who&#8217;ve invented, demonstrated, practiced&#160;and promoted blogging, the collective &#8220;we&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t have been able to get into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV>
<p>Euan picked up a sound bite (below) from one of the 10 Principles with which I&#8217;m experimenting (as in looking for feedback).</p>
<p><P>He picked an interesting one.&nbsp; I&#8217;d argue that without the genius of the thousands and thousands of people who&#8217;ve invented, demonstrated, practiced&nbsp;and promoted blogging, the collective &#8220;we&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t have been able to get into all these conversations about how important conversation and voice are to our ongoing development as societies and as a species.</P><P>Euan challenges &#8230; now that the conversations are being made visible, and shining throught the structures, well &#8230; whatare we gonna do about it and with it ?</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I don&#8217;t know Latin, so this is likely to be goofy &#8230; from <EM>homo sapiens</EM> to <EM>homo interactivus</EM>, or <EM>homo conversens ?</EM></P><P><B><FONT size=4></FONT></B>&nbsp;</P><P><B><FONT size=4><EM><a href="http://theobvious.typepad.com/blog/2005/01/if_its_broke_fi.html">If it&#8217;s broke - fix it.</A></EM></FONT></B></P>
<p><i>Human beings have been having conversations since time began.</i><i> That&#8217;s how we&#8217;ve figured out all of the things we&#8217;ve invente</i><i>d and how we govern ourselves. It&#8217;s how we&#8217;ve gotten to how w</i><i>e are now.</i></p>
<p><i>In the Industrial Age, reporting relationships, and the assum</i><i>ption that the dog on the top of the heap knew more than all </i><i>the other dogs, were the formalized structure for conversatio</i><i>n . It doesn&#8217;t work very well this way, anymore.</i></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/blog/_archives/2005/1/17/253917.html"><u><FONT COLOR="#0000ff">wirearchy</FONT></u></A></p>
<p></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I></I></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV align=right><FONT face=VERDANA color=#000080 size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/the-obvious-focuses-and-amplifies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Principle # 6 - Managing in a Wired Workplace</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/principle-6-managing-in-a-wired-workplace/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/principle-6-managing-in-a-wired-workplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/principle-6-managing-in-a-wired-workplace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;
&#160;
Trust, Transparency and Authenticity are the glue that holds it all together
&#160;
&#160;
People want to trust, they want to believe &#8211; even in the face of large amounts of evidence that the system is being manipulated in the favor of a select few.
&#160;
In North America, we&#8217;re still trying to shake off the disbelief about the blatant&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p ALIGN="center"><strong><em><FONT SIZE=4>Trust, Transparency and Authenticity are the glue that holds </FONT></em></strong><strong><em><FONT SIZE=4>it all together</FONT></em></strong></p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>People want to trust, they want to believe &#8211; even in the face of large amounts of evidence that the system is being manipulated in the favor of a select few.</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>In North America, we&#8217;re still trying to shake off the disbelief about the blatant&nbsp; dishonesty and fraud demonstrated by some corporate (and governmental) leaders.&nbsp; We actively do not want to believe things may be as corrupt as they seem &#8230; institutionalized dishonesty and deceit.</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>We don&#8217;t want to believe that these attitudes and behavior might be more widespread than is apparent, yet somehow we have a feeling that the common corporate culture rewards and supports this possibility.</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>Many people &#8211; checking&nbsp; their 401K&#8217;s or stock portfolios, or looking back at the job(s) they&#8217;ve lost &#8211; feel at best disrespected and at worst enraged that they have been taken advantage of.</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>The interconnectedness of the Web has created a means for people to challenge blind authority, and to push back.&nbsp; If their trust is abused, many will use this to establih their own authority or fight back</p>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<p>Let&#8217;s understand one thing &#8230; when people who have been abused decide to get organized and push back, they become a potent force.&nbsp; </p>
<p><P>&nbsp;</P>
<p>Interconnectedness is a potent force for creating transparency and demanding trust, and many are just now learning how to use it more effectively.</p>
<p><P>&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><em>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></em></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/principle-6-managing-in-a-wired-workplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More from the Bloggerouhaha in Boston</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/more-from-the-bloggerouhaha-in-boston/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/more-from-the-bloggerouhaha-in-boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/more-from-the-bloggerouhaha-in-boston/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you may know that there&#8217;s an upcoming conference at the Shorenstein Centre at Harvard University on &#8220;Blogging, Journalism and Ethics&#8221; that is, in many bloggers&#8217; minds, over before it starts (well 50 - 100 might not be many, but &#8230;  I&#8217;m guessing many bloggers would agree with the few who are speaking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of you may know that there&#8217;s an upcoming conference at the Shorenstein Centre at Harvard University on <a hrfe="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/webcred/index.php?p=23">&#8220;Blogging, Journalism and Ethics&#8221;</a> that is, in many bloggers&#8217; minds, over before it starts (well 50 - 100 might not be many, but &#8230;  I&#8217;m guessing many bloggers would agree with the few who are speaking up).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://sandhill.typepad.com/sandhill_trek/2005/01/the_web_cred_co.html">some essential information about the participants</a> &#8230; hey, as long as it&#8217;s about blogging and credibility, and journalism, we might as well have a look at their backgrounds, huh ?  Thanks go to Frank Paynter of Sandhill Trek</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/webcred/index.php?p=4#comment-584">an interesting comment gleaned from the pack</a> - of course it&#8217;s from the blogosphere&#8217;s dear friend <a href="http://kombinat.blogs.com">Kombinat !</a>    Peekaboo !</p>
<p><em>As David Weinberger mentions &#8216;The Web is a World&#8217; yet I think many people&#8217;s upsets about your conference may be pointing to their grievances that you speak outside of this world in your private bunker by invitation only. The conversation you get to have is yours and on your terms.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see yet in these comments anyone addressing the fact that on the web you don&#8217;t get to control a dialog, you don&#8217;t get to control who speaks. Perhaps this is a bit unsettling that the conference hasn&#8217;t started yet but the community is already engaged in it (even if not invited) and you probably don&#8217;t&#8217; even know why (You do want to wake up to this fact, I beg you please.) <strong>The community speaking from these posts is trying to tell you something yet you guys don&#8217;t seem to want to engage because you follow your agenda of your conference that has a clear schedule. (just notice your comments pointing to &#8216;we&#8217;ll get to that, we&#8217;ll get to that&#8221;.</p>
<p>Well, the community is not waiting on you guys, it&#8217;s attempting a dialog NOW) </strong></p>
<p>This itself is what this community is trying to tell you that your stage construction and design is maybe a bit outdated, thus perhaps irrelevant.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/01/18/more-from-the-bloggerouhaha-in-boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
