<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wirearchy &#187; 2005 &#187; February</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com</link>
	<description>You know more than me, we know more than you, and wherever this all going, we're going there together.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>1 of 100</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/1-of-100/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/1-of-100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/1-of-100/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here, below, is my contribution to a book project titled 100 Bloggers.
I am proud to have been invited into the project by one of the best living advertisments I know for blogging as a personal pastime, Andy Borrows of the blog Older and Growing.  I have watched and read Andy&#8217;s blog since its inception, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, below, is my contribution to <a href="http://jstrande.typepad.com/100bloggers/">a book project titled 100 Bloggers</a>.</p>
<p>I am proud to have been invited into the project by one of the best living advertisments I know for blogging as a personal pastime, <a href="http://olderandgrowing.blogspot.com/">Andy Borrows of the blog Older and Growing</a>.  I have watched and read Andy&#8217;s blog since its inception, and can honestly say (as I have said several times to him) that this man was meant to be a writer &#8230; or at the very least that he should continue writing as a vital passion or hobby.</p>
<p>Thanks, Andy for the vote of confidence and friendship I felt you offered when inviting me to join you and 98 other bloggers.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my heartfelt contribution,</p>
<p><strong>From Word of Mouth to Words In Mouths</strong></p>
<p>Blogging &#8211; what an interesting new word for the many who are discovering the creative and expressive joy of their voice connecting with other hearts and minds.  What a useful and powerful means for those who wish to explore ideas, build friendships, think &#8220;out loud&#8221; or register and activate dissent or various forms of developmental action.  It&#8217;s coming to be recognized as a smooth, highly varied and organically conductive medium for rapidly spreading ideas, concepts and services through wide arcs of connected groups and communities.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not surprising that it&#8217;s also being seen as the current &#8220;best&#8221; way for creating viral awareness of ideas, questions, issues and possibilities.  If we believe (as I submit we should) that we are now well into the process of re-creating most aspects of human sociology in an online context and environment &#8230; at least where humans have computers and access to the Internet &#8230;then what we are witnessing is the online equivalent of the basic human phenomenon of &#8220;word of mouth&#8221;.</p>
<p>But I think there&#8217;s more to it than just &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>The notion of &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; feels so intrinsically right to humans.  It&#8217;s the most human of things, at its finest - a natural voice-carried system of recommending, alerting, warning, questioning and rallying interest and action based on passion and responsibility.</p>
<p>&#8230; Hey, did you hear about this?  It&#8217;s really cool.  &#8230; but you have to watch out for using it too much, &#8216;cuz it gets expensive &#8230;or  &#8230; You&#8217;ve got to get new tires?  Well, last year I replaced mine with that new type from Whatchamabrand and they are really great &#8230; you can get them at the XYZ Tire ranch over on Friendly Street &#8230; you know where it is, don&#8217;t you ?&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>Ideas, experiences and recommendations are pushed out, tentatively at first and as part of normal everyday conversation.  Then, as frequency builds and relationships start, connections firm and enable nuance &#8230; trust builds and people begin to assess, probe, understand, deepen, and add value to each other&#8217;s context and enquiry.   Bit by bit, more and more assertively, connecting and making its way into the mind (and maybe under the skin <img src='http://blog.wirearchy.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> of others.  Word of mouth is a fundamental and intrinsic dynamic of the larger process of human conversation.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s interconnected and interlinked environment, this process is increasingly embodied in the creative, expressive process of blogging.  In this context &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; is often understood as the fundamental behaviour underneath the concepts such as the tipping point, viral marketing, creating a buzz, and both the playful and purposeful exchange of information and knowledge. I tell you, you tell, me, we each tell two friends, and so on and so on. And from these dynamics in an online world, those connections grow breadth, depth, revelation, and human stickiness.</p>
<p>What blogging &#8211; which many people suggest is a new form of human conversation in an online context and environment - brings to these dynamics that may be different from basic &#8220;word of mouth&#8221; is a phenomenon that I&#8217;ll call &#8220;words in mouths&#8221;.</p>
<p>What do I mean by this?</p>
<p>&#8220;Words in mouths&#8221; connotes for me an experience I&#8217;ve come to appreciate deeply in the course of growing my skills as a blogger, individually and in community with other bloggers. Clearly &#8216;word of mouth&#8221; is in operation underneath the distribution and spreading of useful or popular ideas and information &#8230; but I think there&#8217;s something different and perhaps richer or more complex occurring as well &#8230; something that adds depth and richness to the process of &#8220;word of mouth&#8221;.</p>
<p>Just as in basic human word of mouth, online conversations (let&#8217;s call it blogging from hereon in) acquire context, richness, depth, and create trust and relationships. In the process of blogging we write, read, comment and display images that allow us to learn and grow our way into relationship, build trust and move into useful and valuable exchanges of information and knowledge. While blogging, word by word, idea by idea, byte by byte we humans assess and begin to understand those who attend to what we publish, and who probe and extend our personal gropings for sense and meaning.</p>
<p>But/and &#8230; we do it in public, and we do it more often than not while engaged in a curious process that mixes a very personal one-on-one dynamic together with at the same one-to-all and any-to-one process that can be either synchronous or asynchronous in time.  And while blogging we often use links, pointers and pieces of others&#8217; analyses and expositions &#8211; words in mouths, let&#8217;s call it  - to instantiate our thinking and our creative expression.  In doing so ultimately we begin the socially constructed process &#8211; online &#8211; of building a sense of the degree to which we share perspectives, values and interests - and can learn from - others.</p>
<p>We use our personal creative blogging work and read and interact with others&#8217; work  - we use our own &#8220;words in mouth&#8221; and others &#8220;words in mouths&#8221; to co-create meaning and grow a sense of others&#8217; personal explorations, trustworthiness, reliability and humanity.  Blogging our minds and hearts, and interacting to varying degrees with others&#8217; &#8220;words in mouths&#8221; &#8230; whether it serves to dilute, diminish, dismiss, amplify, reinforce or endorse exploration, ideas, beliefs, issues and action allows us to experience the same basic human process served by the dynamics of &#8220;word of mouth&#8221;.  We decide whom we can and want to trust, and seek out the understanding and meaning that allows us to grow, learn and act upon our own socially constructed reality. This then helps us, if not forces us, to work at being clear about who we are, what we believe and want, and how we are going to go about living our lives.</p>
<p>From word of mouth to words in mouths &#8211; blogging allows us to add others, in a new way, to the basic human dynamics of co-creating the world of sense and meaning in which individuals must, necessarily, live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/1-of-100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarity From Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/clarity-from-doc-searls/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/clarity-from-doc-searls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/clarity-from-doc-searls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As always, I&#8217;m reminded of the scene 2/3 of the way through the movie Pleasantville, when the town fathers try to stop people from behaving in ways other than those sanctioned by the customs and habits of Pleasantville .
Look. Blogs are personal journals, written by millions of people, on zillions of topics. Whether or not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, I&#8217;m reminded of the scene 2/3 of the way through the movie Pleasantville, when the town fathers try to stop people from behaving in ways other than those sanctioned by the customs and habits of Pleasantville .</p>
<p><em>Look. Blogs are personal journals, written by millions of people, on zillions of topics. Whether or not those journals practice &#8220;journalism&#8221; is a useless question at this point. Besides, it&#8217;s been done to death.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Generalizing about bloggers is about the same as generalizing about telephone callers or photographers or baseball players. You don&#8217;t say all phone callers are rude, all photographers take nasty pictures or all baseball players spit. So stop saying all bloggers (that third person plural &#8220;They&#8221;) are &#8230;  anything. Because it just ain&#8217;t true. There&#8217;s too damn many of them. All individuals. With nobody in charge</em></p>
<p>The rest of Doc&#8217;s post is <a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/2005/02/28#hereWeGoAgain">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/28/clarity-from-doc-searls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Think &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/26/i-think/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/26/i-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/26/i-think/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; that given current conditions writer&#8217;s block is contagious, even though I&#8217;m not really a writer (yet ?)
All for now &#8230; back later, maybe .. when things change.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; that given current conditions <a href="http://www.ufobreakfast.com/archive/00000367.htm#comments">writer&#8217;s block</a> is contagious, even though I&#8217;m not really a writer (yet ?)</p>
<p>All for now &#8230; back later, maybe .. when things change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/26/i-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise !  Gee, I Wonder &#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/25/surprise-gee-i-wonder/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/25/surprise-gee-i-wonder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/25/surprise-gee-i-wonder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; whether any of that foregone tax revenue might have helped keep Social Security solvent for another few weeks, GW ?&#160;&#160;USA TODAYTax schemes saved 61 top firms $3.4B      &#160;Fri Feb 25, 7:48 AM ETBy Elliot Blair Smith, USA TODAY&#160;Fortune 500 companies took advantage of abusive tax shelters sold to them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV><DIV>&#8230; whether any of that foregone tax revenue might have helped keep Social Security solvent for another few weeks, GW ?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><STRONG>USA TODAY</STRONG></DIV><DIV><STRONG>Tax schemes saved 61 top firms $3.4B</STRONG>      </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Fri Feb 25, 7:48 AM ET</DIV><DIV>By Elliot Blair Smith, USA TODAY</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><EM>Fortune 500 companies took advantage of abusive tax shelters sold to them by their auditors <STRONG>to avoid $1.8 billion in federal taxes from 1998 through 2003</STRONG>, the Government Accountability Office reported Thursday.</EM>                               </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/25/surprise-gee-i-wonder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Said More Clearly &#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/24/said-more-clearly/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/24/said-more-clearly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/24/said-more-clearly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m pretty sure that I said the same thing in the last three paragraphs of this post last weekend, after hearing Robert Scoble deflect Marc Canter&#8217;s question at Northern Voice.
Via Dave Winer&#8217;s Scripting News
Somehow I missed the announcement last week that Microsoft is doing a version 7 of MSIE, proving once again that big technology [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that I said the same thing in <a href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/blog/_archives/2005/2/19/331552.html">the last three paragraphs of this post</a> last weekend, after hearing Robert Scoble deflect Marc Canter&#8217;s question at Northern Voice</a>.</p>
<p>Via Dave Winer&#8217;s <a href="http://www.scripting.com">Scripting News</a></p>
<p><em>Somehow I missed the announcement last week that Microsoft is doing a version 7 of MSIE, proving once again that big technology companies don&#8217;t really listen to their users (although they claim to), but <strong>they do listen to their competitor</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/24/said-more-clearly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noticed In The Peanut Gallery &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/23/noticed-in-the-peanut-gallery/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/23/noticed-in-the-peanut-gallery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/23/noticed-in-the-peanut-gallery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; over at Seeing The Forest blog:
Excellent post, Dave. Thank you. I think there&#8217;s a ghost of a chance that good old-fashioned hubris will catch up with them, but don&#8217;t count on this, even with the stock market falling. The public has to not only see what&#8217;s going on, but has to CARE.
Frankly, I&#8217;m afraid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; over at <a href="http://seetheforest.blogspot.com/2005_02_01_seetheforest_archive.html#110909138824507896">Seeing The Forest</a> blog:</p>
<p><em>Excellent post, Dave. Thank you. I think there&#8217;s a ghost of a chance that good old-fashioned hubris will catch up with them, but don&#8217;t count on this, even with the stock market falling. The public has to not only see what&#8217;s going on, but has to CARE.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m afraid we&#8217;re eventually headed for a revolution. I&#8217;m also afraid that the neocons are counting on that, so that, once completely defeated and put down, we&#8217;re obliterated forever. So be extra careful about that. It wouldn&#8217;t hurt to become familiar with the Resistance movement&#8217;s methods during WW II. We can&#8217;t just sit here like a bunch of sheep waiting for terrible things to happen.</em></p>
<p>MJ | Email | Homepage | 02.22.05 - 1:49 pm | #</p>
<p><em>Another admittedly horrible thought: Don&#8217;t underestimate Russia and China. Not to mention &#8220;Old Europe.&#8221; As this bunch of idiots goes deeper and deeper into debt, mostly to countries that are NOT OUR FRIENDS, these older and vastly more sophisticated societies watch and wait.</p>
<p>The truth we&#8217;re so proud of our military power, yet we don&#8217;t even have enough of an army to subdue Iraq. Yeah, we spend more on military power than the rest of the world put together, most of it on graft and corruption and idiot Starwars type projects. Ideology is in control, and ideology leads to blindness. This crew doesn&#8217;t have a clue to how to deal with other societies, and believe me, the rest of the world knows that. So, they can afford to watch and wait until we&#8217;ve bankrupted ourselves. That&#8217;s what I meant by hubris.</em></p>
<p>MJ | Email | Homepage | 02.22.05 - 2:10 pm | #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/23/noticed-in-the-peanut-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Fuck ! &#8230; Here They Come ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/21/oh-fuck-here-they-come/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/21/oh-fuck-here-they-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/21/oh-fuck-here-they-come/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via the new Whiskey Bar, where there&#8217;s an an ongoing series of posts that imo show the developing path towards a branded, consumable fascism-in-all-but-name south of the border.
Whither Canada?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via the new <a href="http://www.billmon.org">Whiskey Bar</a>, where there&#8217;s an an ongoing series of posts that imo show the developing path towards a branded, consumable fascism-in-all-but-name south of the border.</p>
<p><em><strong>Whither Canada?</strong?</p>
<p>An influential tri-national panel has considered a raft of bold proposals for an integrated North America, including a continental customs union, single passport and contiguous security perimeter . . . The document talks about the need to develop a North American brand, and muses about the possibility of common immigration and customs policies, closer consultation on monetary policy and integrated security policies.</p>
<p>Toronto Star</p>
<p>Border talks called 'disturbing'</p>
<p>February 14, 2005</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>Anschluss: German term designating the incorporation of Austria into Germany in the 1930s. Anschluss was first advocated by Austrian Social Democrats . . . After Hitler's rise to power the Nazis took over the idea.</p>
<p>The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia</p>
<p>Anschluss</p>
<p>2001</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>Thomas d'Aquino, head of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and one of the task force's vice-chairs, said the summary reflected only preliminary discussions . . . saying insinuations of a secret agenda are "totally wrong."</p>
<p>Toronto Star</p>
<p>Border talks called 'disturbing'</p>
<p>February 14, 2005</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>The secret documents published since 1945 make it quite clear that Germany had no carefully laid plans to annex Austria . . . Instead, every effort was made to . . . win a gradual, peaceful extension of Nazi influence.</p>
<p>Carroll Quigley</p>
<p>Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time</p>
<p>1975</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>U.S. troops could be deployed to Canada and Canadian troops could cross the border into the United States if the continent is attacked by terrorists, according to an agreement announced today by U.S. and Canadian officials . . . The agreement has prompted debate here about a potential erosion of Canada's sovereignty. U.S. dominance has long been an issue in this country, which sits next-door to the world's only superpower. But [Canadian defense minister John] McCallum said there should be little concern. "We are in control," McCallum said, "by putting Canada in a position to work with the United States to defend North America."</p>
<p>Washington Post</p>
<p>U.S., Canada Reach Agreement to Let Troops Cross Border</p>
<p>December 10, 2002</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>Hitler's excuse for swallowing up the independent nation of Austria and incorporating it into a Greater German Reich was that he was "protecting" the Austrian people from a Communist uprising.</p>
<p>Scrapbookpages.com</p>
<p>Austrian History</p>
<p>Date Unknown</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>"There is no security threat to Canada that the United States would not be ready, willing and able to help with. There would be no debate. There would be no hesitation. We would be there for Canada, part of our family. That is why so many in the United States are disappointed and upset that Canada is not fully supporting us now."</p>
<p>U.S. Ambassador Paul Cellucci</p>
<p>Speech at the Economic Club of Toronto</p>
<p>March 25, 2003</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>"This day has placed us in a tragic and decisive situation . . . So I take leave of the Austrian people with a German word of farewell uttered from the depth of my heart: God Protect Austria!"</p>
<p>Austrian Chancellor Kurt von Schuschnigg</p>
<p>Resignation Speech</p>
<p>March 11, 1938</p>
<p>..............</p>
<p>The slogan on a banner over Loos Haus in Vienna has the words of Hitler: "Those of the same blood belong in the same Reich.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/21/oh-fuck-here-they-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Sociology &#038; Technology Trump The Combination of Corporatism and Control ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/will-sociology-technology-trump-the-combination-of-corporatism-and-control/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/will-sociology-technology-trump-the-combination-of-corporatism-and-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/will-sociology-technology-trump-the-combination-of-corporatism-and-control/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugh Beam&#8217;s Chief Blogging Officer Chris el Rageboy reminisces about some of the hope held out by the core messages of the Cluetrain.
the scobelization of microsoft
This is going to be a followup to yesterday&#8217;s post about Firefox. But first I want to tell a little story to set up an analogy.
Really &#8230;  he is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Beam&#8217;s Chief Blogging Officer Chris el Rageboy reminisces about some of the hope held out by the core messages of the Cluetrain.</p>
<p><strong>the scobelization of microsoft</strong></p>
<p><em>This is going to be a followup to yesterday&#8217;s post about Firefox. But first I want to tell a little story to set up an analogy.</em></p>
<p>Really &#8230;  he is going to reminisce.</p>
<p>It sometimes seems tough to remember that corporations are indeed full of real people, people who care &#8230; while his posts suggest that there may be some very interesting fulcra for change appear when connections, intent and ways to exchange and build ideas meet, please remember that corporations typically will listen to a range of different and critical voices only when forced to do so, whether by competitive innovation, financial constraints or societal accountability and regulation.</p>
<p>Underneath their personae, they share a core brand &#8230; I mean, <a href="http://www.thehappytutor.com">it&#8217;s all Wealth Bondage after all</a>, isn&#8217;t it &#8230; <a href="http://www.thehappytutor.com/archives/2004/08/cooperation_in.html">even if we converse, cooperate and collaborate</a> ?</p>
<p>The purpose, design, structure and dynamics of corporations are still in most cases intently aimed at keeping people unconscious and buying rather than conscious and demanding of clear improvements to human systems of cooperation and collaboration.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Chris, though, <a href="http://www.chiefbloggingofficer.com/2005/02/scobelization-of-microsoft.html">breathing in-and-out on what may be possible, if we put our minds &#8230;. and voices .. to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/will-sociology-technology-trump-the-combination-of-corporatism-and-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging - An Update by Elise</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/blogging-an-update-by-elise/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/blogging-an-update-by-elise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/blogging-an-update-by-elise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full post is a complete and well-developed analysis of a still-very-new economic space &#8230; and a worthwhile read for those who are interested in some of the less-than-personal-or-political uses to which some form(s) of blogging will be bent.&#160;&#160;Weblog Tools Market - Update February 2005&#160;By Elise Bauer  February 15, 2005  &#160;Updated February 18, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><DIV><DIV>The full post is <a href="http://www.elise.com/web/a/weblog_tools_market_update_february_2005.php">a complete and well-developed analysis of a still-very-new economic space</A> &#8230; and a worthwhile read for those who are interested in some of the less-than-personal-or-political uses to which some form(s) of blogging will be bent.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><STRONG>Weblog Tools Market - Update February 2005</STRONG></DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><EM>By Elise Bauer</EM>  </DIV><DIV><EM>February 15, 2005</EM>  </DIV><DIV><EM></EM>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><EM>Updated February 18, 2005. Scroll to end to see update.</EM>         </DIV><DIV><EM></EM>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><EM>This article is a continuation of the analysis presented six months ago in An Overview of the Weblog Tools Market.</EM>                   </DIV><DIV><EM></EM>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><EM>Last August in </EM><a href="http://www.elise.com/web/a/an_overview_of_the_weblog_tools_market.php"><EM>An Overview of the Weblog Tools Market </EM></A><EM>the concept of a Weblog Tools Use Index was introduced - the degree to which Google spidered pages associated with certain weblog tools, with the proposal that this number could be used as a proxy for the extent to which the tools are being used, and therefore give some indication of &#8220;share&#8221; of use. To reduce the confusion that that terminology caused, in this article the sum of the number of websites linking to a weblog tool URL and the number of websites containing the URL will simply be the factor used to determine comparative percentages, or &#8220;Google Share&#8221;.</EM>                                                                                                            </DIV><DIV><EM></EM>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV><EM>I believe that Google Share is a fair proxy of the extent to which these tools are actually used, with some caveats. Blogs that are used in a corporate setting often sit behind corporate firewalls, or may have any reference to the blog tool stripped out. This would affect the numbers for tools such as Movable Type, Wordpress, and other stand-alone (non-hosted) blog applications. Among hosted services, Typepad offers password-protected, non-indexed blogs which account for 30% of the total Typepad use, according to Typepad maker Six Apart. Typepad would therefore be underrepresented in Google by this amount.</EM>                                                                                                </DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></DIV><DIV align=right><FONT FACE="VERDANA" COLOR="#000080" size=-1><I>Powered By <a href="http://www.qumana.com" TARGET="_blank">Qumana</A></I></FONT></DIV></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/20/blogging-an-update-by-elise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft &#8230; A Ways To Go ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/19/microsoft-a-ways-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/19/microsoft-a-ways-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/19/microsoft-a-ways-to-go/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of points of information just connected for me whilst over on the Gaping Void blog &#8230;
Gaping Void&#8217;s Hugh and Microsoft&#8217;s Scoble back-and-forth a fair bit on Hugh&#8217;s blog.  Hugh holds forth on the hughtrain, and the ways, means and attitudes for listening to the customer, creativity and innovation in this interconnected environment.
Hugh [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points of information just connected for me whilst over on the <a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com">Gaping Void blog</a> &#8230;</p>
<p>Gaping Void&#8217;s Hugh and Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011">Scoble</a> back-and-forth a fair bit on Hugh&#8217;s blog.  Hugh holds forth on the hughtrain, and the ways, means and attitudes for listening to the customer, creativity and innovation in this interconnected environment.</p>
<p>Hugh said recently, on Windows 2000 and Microsoft</p>
<p><em><strong>Windows 2000</strong></p>
<p>In an earlier post, I had the thought:</p>
<p>Maybe Microsofts&#8217; main competitor isn&#8217;t Apple. Maybe it&#8217;s M.I.T.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s Robert Scoble responded in the comments:</p>
<p>Our real competition? Windows 2000.</p>
<p>&#8230;If we don&#8217;t make better products no one will upgrade. Windows 2000 will have won.</p>
<p>Well, I agree that nobody will upgrade without a better product, and I also that believe true competition comes from within the company, not from outside it. But basically, I disagree with Robert&#8217;s point about Windows 2000.</p>
<p>Robert, 2000 was five years ago. There were only a handful of blogs, the World Trade Center was still standing, Enron was the pride of Houston and people were still buying stocks in dotcoms.</p>
<p>Even if you remove chronology from the equation, Windows 2000 is a known quantity.</p>
<p>Known quantities belong to the past, not the future (and no, there is no present)</em></p>
<p>Scoble (The Economist&#8217;s Chief Humanising Officer for Microsoft) is building a considerable reputation for being open, listening well, and playing back to Microsoft the conversations going on amongst its customers.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s also been lauded (rightly, imo) for congratulating <a href="http://www.firefox.com">Firefox</a> for its rapid success &#8230; I think he cited approximately 25 million downloads in about 10 weeks.</p>
<p>Today in his keynote address at the <a href="http://www.northernvoice.ca">Northern Voices</a> blogging conference <a href="http://marc.blogs.it">Marc Canter</a> (I believe) asked Robert a question about whether Microsoft would have come out with IE 7.0 had it not been for Firefox.</p>
<p>Robert stopped for a second, chuckled sheepishly and said (if i remember correctly) &#8230;. &#8220;Probably not&#8221; &#8230; and then demurred graciously to Marc by continuing &#8230;&#8221;if it weren&#8217;t for you and the others posting so many great suggestions to the team&#8217;s wiki&#8221;.</p>
<p>A nice semi-tangential reflection, but what I noticed was the &#8220;probably not&#8221; in the context of Firefox.</p>
<p>What are the backwards-looking odds that without such a clear and significant improvement from Firefox (not to mention some of the other great alternative browsers out there), Microsoft would have happily continued on deflecting and not really listening to its customers who, after all, have been complaining long and loud for some time about the inadequacies of IE 6.0 ?</p>
<p>My guess is that they would have - maybe - gotten around to it on their own time, notwithstanding their growing reputation (is it just really slick but maybe ultimately unsubstantive PR is the question that comes to mind) for listening to and working with their customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2005/02/19/microsoft-a-ways-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
