<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Caught On Clusterfuck Nation &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wirearchy.com/2008/04/06/comment-caught-on-clusterfuck-nation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2008/04/06/comment-caught-on-clusterfuck-nation/</link>
	<description>You know more than me, we know more than you, and wherever this all going, we're going there together.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2008/04/06/comment-caught-on-clusterfuck-nation/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2008/04/06/comment-caught-on-clusterfuck-nation/#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Is that a challengeto me, or a general challenge ?

My personal world view is reasonably pessimistic.  I believe that 99% (well, maybe 98%) of the world's 6-billion plus people want nothing more than to live adequately, be peaceful and cooperative, enjoy helping others and being engaged in socially constructive initiatives, and so on, but must try to do so in a structure of systems that have enured to the benefit of a small group of people who sit at / on the top of the current structured systems, and that incremental change won't get us to where (arguably) we may need to be.

And most accepted large-scale change theory would suggest that solid substantive deep change won't happen until instantiated by major crisis.

This may also be interesting for you to look at ...

http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/2008/04/03.html#a2134

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a challengeto me, or a general challenge ?</p>
<p>My personal world view is reasonably pessimistic.  I believe that 99% (well, maybe 98%) of the world&#8217;s 6-billion plus people want nothing more than to live adequately, be peaceful and cooperative, enjoy helping others and being engaged in socially constructive initiatives, and so on, but must try to do so in a structure of systems that have enured to the benefit of a small group of people who sit at / on the top of the current structured systems, and that incremental change won&#8217;t get us to where (arguably) we may need to be.</p>
<p>And most accepted large-scale change theory would suggest that solid substantive deep change won&#8217;t happen until instantiated by major crisis.</p>
<p>This may also be interesting for you to look at &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/2008/04/03.html#a2134" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.salon.com/0002007/2008/04/03.html#a2134</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.wirearchy.com/2008/04/06/comment-caught-on-clusterfuck-nation/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wirearchy.com/2008/04/06/comment-caught-on-clusterfuck-nation/#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>I couldn't follow who said what.  I would throw out a challenge though.  If you believe someone could benefit from your world view, make it available.
See Neil Turok on TED.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t follow who said what.  I would throw out a challenge though.  If you believe someone could benefit from your world view, make it available.<br />
See Neil Turok on TED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
