November 26, 2004

You are currently browsing the daily archive for November 26, 2004.

… as futurists would say.

From Jerry Michalski’s blog. Jerry is a former editor of Release 1.0, and (I believe) still an influential guy in the tech world.

Josh gets blogged — big time

In the episode of West Wing airing right now — The Hubbert Peak — Josh Lyman manages to ram a Prius while test-driving a big red SUV.

Not only does the incident get blogged right away, but the ramee’s daughter moblogs it with her cam-phone. Then Josh is on the phone with the blogger, gives an obnoxious answer that he assumes is “off the record” and watches as his words show up on the blog while he’s still on the call.

Blogging, dear friends, is mainstream. What we do with it now matters more.

Did I mention Bartlett plugging The Tipping Point?

…building relationships, profile and learning through blogging.

Hugh Macleod of GapingVoid writes a serious and insightful bit on why he thinks blogging is an early signal about what advertising could be, absent the bumpf and bluster … and cost.

Extracted from the gapingvoid blog

Having spent a good portion of my early career in has-been, stuffy, conservative agencies, I’ve done my fair share of fantasising about what I’d do if the has-been, stuffy conservative client ever got around to letting the team and I come up with anarchic, crazy, cutting-edge stunts, the kind Steve writes about so well.

Of course, it never happened.

But maybe that’s a good thing. The older I get, the less these crazy stunts seem like career-building exercises, and the more they just seem like “re-arranging deckchairs on the Titanic”.

I think the game has moved on.

Here’s an example. Ask me to name what I think is the most brilliant piece of new advertising I’ve come across in the last 5 years.

My answer would not be some big, funky-dunky campaign from a company like Apple or Volkswagon.

My answer would not be something from some edgy, hipster, in-your-face creative hot-shop in downtown Manhattan or London.

My answer would be Robert Scoble, a regular guy with a regular job who blogs regularly about the company he works for. That company happens to be Microsoft.

I seriously believe Robert, on Microsoft’s behalf, is making more advertising history at this very moment than all the creative hot-shops combined. He is changing the game beyond all recognition. The hot-shops are not.

And he’s probably doing it at less than 1% of the price the conventional agencies are used to charging.

So if you find yourself working in advertising, you now have two choices:

1. Try to prove folks like me wrong or

2. Get with the program.

A lot of people will opt for Choice Number 1. A lot of them will lose everything.

I think he’s right.

Britt Blaser on hierarchy and the effects of the Internet.

TCP/IP vs. NTSC

It’s Vint Cerf’s fault.

Talk about the law of unintended consequences! In an attempt to secure our political hierarchy’s communications from the advances of their hierarchy, he co-developed the TCP/IP protocol in the 1970s, building on concepts developed in the 60s: J. R. Licklider’s Galactic Network memos. The purpose was straightforward enough, to harden our nuclear command & control system against nuclear attack. But the architecture does something more profound. Essentially, it lets messages have their way with the network.

That’s heady stuff because it gently erodes the very thing it was built to protect, the underpinning of all human societies: Hierarchy. Practically speaking, that means patriarchy. Most of us know how a patriarchy works. The alpha male, no matter how absurd the hovel he rules, dictates what may or may not be discussed in the household. As long as everybody toes the line and tiptoes around the Barca Lounger, everything’s fine. But cross that invisible line and the snarl emerges, often with the hickory switch. We discover the line by observing our Alpha Thug’s reaction, not by an explicit set of rules he’s taught us so we can stay out of trouble. Indeed, sudden, terrible trouble is the operating protocol of domination:it keeps the vassals on their toes. (Every alpha male is in turn a vassal to some other male: .)

So the hierarchy controls all messages constantly, explicitly and vehemently. I think that’s what’s going on right now. Patriarchs everywhere are stung by the growth of peer-to-peer messaging: wounded elephants, thrashing around breaking the pottery.

Not quite the same as the dalai Lama’s message in hios book The Art Of Happiness, but wise advice nevertheless. Well, come to think of it, maybe not so very different than what DL might say.

Via the Drunken Monkey blog

“Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing whatever you think is worth doing. One man may find happiness in supporting a wife and children. Another may find it in robbing banks. Still another may labor mightily for years in pursuing pure research with no discernible result. Note the individual and subjective nature of each case.

No two are alike and there is no reason to expect them to be.

Each man or woman must find for himself or herself that occupation in which hard work and long hours make him or her happy. Contrariwise, if you are looking for shorter hours and longer vacations and early retirement, you are in the wrong job. Perhaps you need to take up bank robbing. Or geeking in a sideshow. Or even politics.”

- Robert Heinlein