December 9, 2004

You are currently browsing the daily archive for December 9, 2004.

Air America, and Liberals Still Playing “Nice”

Today, Al was playing choice cuts of Rush’s idiotic, morally debauched rationalizations for torture at Abu Ghraib and Gitmo. A pointless exercise, since Dittohead Mark thinks any criticism of the military is picking out the negative instead of accenting the positive. He insisted, practically demanded, that instead of emphasizing the occasional bad thing the military’s doing in Iraq–you know, like wiping out entire wedding parties–Al should come up with one positive item a day from Iraq. And not be sarcastic about it either, Mark added.

At which point I would told Mark to open a high window and go fly. But Al, being nicer than most, kept his rumpled cool.

So this is where we are in 2004. Conservatives not only dictate the terms of debate from their side, but dictate how the other side should conduct itself (i.e., like eunuchs). Liberals would never bother pestering Rush or Ann Coulter to acknowledge one positive achievement of liberalism or feminism a day, because they know they’d only get a dismissive get-lost in return. But conservative have no hesitation in lecturing liberals on how to discuss the war in Iraq, even though all of the power in Washington is now concentrated in Republican hands and liberal Democrats haven’t the slightest input into the decision-making process.

Al should have told his dittohead friend that it’s too damned late to be sprinking sugar on the mound of corpses mounting in Iraq, but instead he persisted in this exercise in futility, trying to persuade someone who’s unpersuadable, winkle a mind that’s proudly, defiantly clam-shut. It really is liberal masochism trying to find common ground with someone who believes liberals barely deserve to occupy the same earth. Dittohead Mark might concede a minor point here or there, but he’s never going to budge on the big dumb positions his hero Rush holds dear, and using his powers of reason on a sensibility so inert is a waste of Al’s breath, and a waste of the listener’s time.

the exoneration of George Galloway, a British MP (whom the right-wing called, wrongly, “Saddam’s Little Helper”)

The Telegraph did me and the anti-war movement an injustice and the judge held it to account. But the Blair government - which used the Telegraph’s assault to force me out of a Labour party I’d served for 36 years - has committed an incomparably greater injustice. Iraq was invaded on trumped-up charges. As a result, an estimated 100,000 Iraqis have died; the lives of millions more have been wrecked. This week we learned the conditions of child health in a land occupied are now even worse than during the killing years of sanctions. Yet not a single government minister has fallen. No official has been sacked. Alastair Campbell has become a highly paid raconteur and talk show host. John Scarlett, unblushing, has been promoted to head the Secret Intelligence Service. The guilty men in Whitehall and Westminster remain unpunished.

Now the stain on my name has been removed, I intend to step up my efforts, with others both inside and outside parliament, to harry and hold to account those responsible for the crimes of the Iraq war.”

Doc Searls points to a new blog, and waxes optimistic. It sounds portentous … Gary Becker, professor at University of Chicago and a Nobel-winning economist and Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institute at Stanford, and Richard Posner, a U.S. Circuit Court Judge.

Emphasis added

Blogging is a major new social, political, and economic phenomenon. It is a fresh and striking exemplification of Friedrich Hayek¹s thesis that knowledge is widely distributed among people and that the challenge to society is to create mechanisms for pooling that knowledge.

The powerful mechanism that was the focus of Hayek¹s work, as as of economists generally, is the price system (the market). The newest mechanism is the ³blogosphere.² There are 4 million blogs. The internet enables the instantaneous pooling (and hence correction, refinement, and amplification) of the ideas and opinions, facts and images, reportage and scholarship, generated by bloggers.

We have decided to start a blog that will explore current issues of economics, law, and policy in a dialogic format. Initially we will be posting just once a week, on Mondays. In time we may post more frequently. The first postings will be tomorrow, December 6.

I’m going to answer “Yes” to my question, and here’s why.

A lot of the news about blogs is about two key features of blogging …. two-wayness and voice … that are the outcomes of sociology meeting technology head on.

Both attributes are the results of communication and sharing attempts at making meaning using a medium that didn’t really exist for most people only 15 years ago.

Information architecture, basic web site technology and the infrastructure of the Internet have all sufficiently advanced such that blogging is becoming able to combine all three to let individuals connect and exchange via personal publishing … of text, images, voice and video.

I’ve consistently noticed over the past three years how and what I felt when reading other peoples’ blog, when considering the ebbs, flows, insights, resolutions and other arcana of my relationship with blogging, and when engaged in dialogue with others via the Comments section of their blogs and on my blog.

When listening to other peoples’ voices … I look at sentence structures, I notice style, I read woop-ass phrases with delight, I marvel, shake my head and sigh when i go through some of the truly brilliant material I have seen (there are some real genius people out there … amazing). I make the conscious decision, from time to time, to give a full 30 minutes or hour (or two) to go through other peoples’ material … and this involves feeling whether i am ready to shift my body position, slow down and concentrate … attend.

Some people blog light and positive, some people literally hurl invective … others satirize, in different styles … you learn to look for the smirk, or the knowing wink, or the shared nod of understanding and reflection. Colours matter, and the cleanliness or delicacy or whimsy or banality of the font, the spacing … the blogger who writes deliciously and with long sentences, having fun … or the inspired, organic use of photos.

Two-wayness … this is a type of interaction that is truly different, I think, than talking with someone else on the phone, or speaking to them face to face. In both those cases, the evidence of what was communicated and exchanged evapoartes, if you will, unless recorded. The two-way exchange via a blog post and comments, or the more general two-wayness of links, has persistence (as many have noted before), and the process of creating, sending and receiving the information is also quite different. Organizing thoughts and speaking, either formally or informally, is very different from typing and posting words and images to ocnvey one’s message and meaning. And this persistent, always accessible two-wayness creates meaning in and of itself - the medium becomes part of the meaning created

Comments … some make you angry, or resigned to the stupidity and viciousness of trolls … some take your breath away, and lift you up, either through empathy and a felt senes of understanding and respect .. or equally, through a robust challenge to one or another assertion you may have made. The way a host responds to a range of comments, questions, challenges, and attacks can be very revealing, and I swear one can feel the calmness, or the brusque charm of an opinionated expert, or the anger or sadness in another person’s expression of their care and concern.

You get physically involved, sometimes … often ? … with the process of blogging, typing faster when your’re clear and excited, slowly and more deliberately or more vaguely, when you’re thinking or just scratching your ass and looking out the window.

Working with and in blogs makes you sometimes want to get together with other people who share this somewhat unusual but “you-know-it’s-so-natural-too” hobby of blogging. And so of course you notice outbreaks, sometimes, of people who live in a certain regional area getting together for drinks, or the phenomenon of Bloggercons and Foo Camps and Poptechs and Supernovas and SXSWs that have popped up in the past fiuve years - the sociality that is more and more accompanying the use of interconnected social technologies in this era. And of course there was a great deal of empassioned, high-engagement blogging work involved in the last three years of political campaigning that we’ve all ived through.

Doing this makes me feel social, and some of my readers may know that I’ve actually gone about meeting quite a few bloggers over the past three years - in the USA, the UK, France, Holland, and Germany, and across Canada. I enjoy meeting these new people who feel like friends already, because they have been writing and posting what it is that makes them who they are, and so I feel like I know them somewhat already … a basic threshold of trust has been established.

Other bloggers’ writing style and tone, syntax, degree of focus, diversity and other factors all combine to often give me a feeling of being able to feel the other persons’ presence coming through that which I see, read, observe and ponder. So I think you can feel other peoples’ blogs, yes.