September 2004

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for September 2004.

This is an interesting way of looking at things …. Doc passes on Frank Leahy’s perspectives on two-party politics (actually, i’d call 1.5 party politics).

The most interesting point to this brief piece is, I think, the extrapolation of this way of looking at things to most of our activities in daily life, our waking hours. We are so used to being bombarded by one-way marketing messages that, basically, I think many people get sort-of subconsciously annoyed if they are “forced” to think about things that may be a bit unclear or somehow ambiguous.

geez … I think that means we’re in for spot o’ trouble here and there, because it seems clear and unambiguous that human, environmental, political and other large-sclae issues aren’t likely to get less complex any time soon.

From Doc’s blog:

Frank Leahy: The 7-11-ification of Politics In America.

 

And the same thing has happened to American politics. The same two chains — Republicans and Democrats — are the only two stores in town. There¹s no longer a place to have a conversation about what matters in America. All the real conversations have been relegated to the far back corner, if you can even find them at all.

 

And what makes it worse is that the two parties aren¹t really interested in conversations, they¹re only interested in messages. Why are there no major newspapers or other media outlets that will present anything but the message of the day? Why is there no way in America to talk about the corporatification of America? No way to ask why health care isn¹t a right instead of a privilege? No way to suggest that maybe locking up people for using drugs might not be the best use of our money or their talents? No way to wonder why teachers are paid less than prison guards, or to do anything about it?

No, all the conversations are full of the same empty calories that you buy at the local village shop. There is no place for meat and vegetables in the national conversation.

The Participate / Collaborate Summit is underway. A bit of introduction at first … Sara Diamond on “why collaborate, with whom and why”.

Then a tour around the room, with short introductions by all participants. Lots of very interesting people, focused on mostly interesting sounding (some kinda abstract) research and/or active art and social collaboratibve projects. people from all over Canada, fair representation from the UK, a couple of Americans, some people from the Netherlands, Germany and several people on line, in real-time streaming … from Germany, China and the USA.

Here’s a picture I snapped in the first few hours following my arrival at the Banff Centre …. about half an hour after eating, and an hour after taking a swim.

I thought of Euan Semple as I took it … he has an ongoiing love affair with mountains, and so I hope he’ll see this picture … and want to come to Banff.

I’m off in a couple of hours to a four-day conference at the Banff New Media Institute, where I will be a panel member on Saturday. Seems like a great opportunity to meet some interesting people, and perhaps throw another stone into the ever-rippling pond of ideas, links and connections made possible by the Internet and the blogosphere.

Thanks to the Happy Tutor for helping cast a first stone, with his blog post titled “For the Banff Conference - A Bridge to some Online Conversations about Democracy, Giving, and Technology”

Thanks also to Tom Matrullo for his blog post that helps us begin to link our notions of a commons (pristine, middle-of-New-England-town-empty-spaces) to another view of the commons as lively, vibrant public renderings (zocalo) of an imperfect past and present shared by all for the ongoing construction of public memory.

…. In case this current 3D world is too much for you, here’s an easy way to slip into another dimension.

Just One Story

This from a commenter over at Atrios, noting that the most recent Republican strategy is to pplay the victim, the underdog, and to pretend, over and over again that being against anything they say or do is being against Truth, Freedom, Motherhood, Apple Pie and the American Way.

Pernicious, and unfortunately much too effective.

As bad as NPR, PBS NewsHour tonight: Clarence Page (I think that’s the right name) in his commentary over the “Mission Accomplished” piece repeated the idiotic and easily disproven SCLM meme that “Bush never actually said ‘Mission Accomplished’”.

Contrast this utter contempt for facts or research with the story told by Scott Taylor that the mujahedeen who captured him in Iraq asked for proof he was a Canadian journalist, then went off to google him for verification. This in the middle of a war zone during a firefight!!

Christ. I just have to shut the fucking TV off now because I can’t listen to the swirling cesspool of liars any more

I am impressed by his past analyses, I trust his thinking, and he seems worried.

Billmon again demonstrates brevity and a clear point, here.

Here are a couple of pictures taken on the last day of the outdoor swimming season, at the Kitsilano swimming pool.

I have an ongoing love affair with this swimming pool. I have swum there all but a handful of the days this season, which runs from the last weekend in May until mid-September.

It’s 137.5 metres long which is the equivalent of 2 and 2/3 Olympic length swimming pools … it takes forever to do one length, and only 12 make it a mile that you will have swum.

A must-read blog post, in which David adds another important laeyr of clarity and understanding of the fundamental market behaviours that are beginning to flow (and become visible) from a new set of structures for the interaction of information.

Here’s an excerpt - the last few paragraphs. You really need to read it from the beginning to get the full force and importance of what David writes here.

Then I described the End to End principle and how it’s enabled the Net to spawn an amazing marketplace of innovation. Tinker with the center and there can be disastrous unintended consequences. E.g., if packets contained bits that ID’ed the user in any strong sense, the Net would have been nought but a research library. (No, I don’t know that that’s true. Emergent effects are too hard to predict. It was just an example, and at least a few people nodded. Good enough.)

I said that I understand that to them the Net looks like a medium through which content passes, some of which people aren’t paying for. But, (sez I) their customers aren’t “consuming” content. We’re not consuming anything. We’re listening to music, We’re watching video streams, We’re talking with friends. To call it content is to miss why it matters to Big Content’s customers.

BigCon’s product, I said, is special. It’s published. That means it’s given over to the public for us to appropriate it, make it our own. We hum it, we quote it, we make jokes with it as a punchline, we get it wrong. We do that because it matters to us. And that’s how creative works succeed. They become ours in some sense.

Further, culture advances by our having the leeway to build on published work and incorporate it into other works. From The Star Spangled Banner to most of Disney’s feature length cartoons, that’s what we do.

So, we need the leeway, both to be able to continue as a culture, and more important from their point of view to continue to get value from what the Big Content folks produce. It’s our ability to absorb and reuse that gives their product value.

I ended by saying, perhaps too forcefully, “I’m here arguing for using this remarkable global connectedness to enable the flowering of culture the Internet seems born to provide…and you call me the barbarian?” I think it just alienated them.

I also made the stupid, self-indulgent error of saying that trying to “monetize communities” (the official topic of the session) was evil. Shoot, I’m in favor of monetizing communities. But, as the Greek doctor said, first do no harm. D’oh d’oh d’oh.

… asked the Chimperor with a smirk and a swagger at the joint Bush - Allawi press conference I’m watching at this moment, live on CNN. He was starting to take questions, and obviously wanted to make a point about how they didn’t get him (yet).

Excuse my language, folks, but what an arrogant asshole !

Update

Wow ! IMO, he screwed up bigtime. The Afghan army went into Najaf ?

Influmential … is that a new word, or another Bushism ?

He essentially ended the press conference in mid-sentence … you could literally see the wheels trying to turn. He realized he was getting into worse and worse trouble, and so just stopped.

Embarassing. Made one cringe and laugh to watch. I wonder how he feels in his private moments of self-honesty (although he’d be one person that I suspect might actually never have any).

I don’t know how to link, on this blog, to Cory’s Change This pdf that I just read on David Weinberger’s JOHO.

It’s so good, so right, so fundamental.

Here it is, via JOHO’s permalink

… by Juan Cole

IMO, every single American should read this piece by Dr. Cole, before they listen once again to the man who calls himself the United States’ President.

There’s been a big flap over CBS and Dan Rather putting out possibly forged documents about Bush’s service with the TANG.

Salon.com decided to fully research the matter of Bush’s service, to set out as much established fact as possible.

Please compare and contrast this with John Kerry’s service record in Vietnam.

The authenticity of the memos, which contain very few facts about Bush’s actual service, is a sideshow in the effort to determine the truth about Bush’s military service. (Independent researchers such as Paul Lukasiak, retired Army Col. Gerald Lechliter and Marty Heldt have contributed to this ongoing effort to uncover the facts.)

Consider the following anomalies:

(Note that statements below that certain documents do not exist, or that Bush failed to obtain proper authorization, are based on the White House’s repeated insistence that all relevant Bush military documents have been made public. Some of these documents, of course, may yet turn up.)

Bush flew for the last time on April 16, 1972. Upon entering the Guard, Bush agreed to fly for 60 months. After his training was complete, he owed 53 months of flying.

- But he flew for only 22 of those 53 months.

Upon being accepted for pilot training, Bush promised to serve with his parent (Texas) Guard unit for five years once he completed his pilot training.

- But Bush served as a pilot with his parent unit for just two years.

In May 1972 Bush left the Houston Guard base for Alabama. According to Air Force regulations, Bush was supposed to obtain prior authorization before leaving Texas to join a new Guard unit in Alabama.

- But Bush failed to get the authorization.

In requesting a permanent transfer to a nonflying unit in Alabama in 1972, Bush was supposed to sign an acknowledgment that he received relocation counseling.

- But no such document exists.

He was supposed to receive a certification of satisfactory participation from his unit.

- But Bush did not.

He was supposed to sign and give a letter of resignation to his Texas unit commander.

- But Bush did not.

He was supposed to receive discharge orders from the Texas Air National Guard adjutant general.

- But Bush did not.

He was supposed to receive new assignment orders for the Air Force Reserves.

- But Bush did not.

On his transfer request Bush was asked to list his “permanent address.”

- But he wrote down a post office box number for the campaign he was working for on a temporary basis.

On his transfer request Bush was asked to list his Air Force specialty code.

- But Bush, an F-102 pilot, erroneously wrote the code for an F-89 or F-94 pilot. Both planes had been retired from service at the time. Bush, an officer, made this mistake more than once on the same form.

On May 26, 1972, Lt. Col. Reese Bracken, commander of the 9921st Air Reserve Squadron at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama, informed Bush that a transfer to his nonflying unit would be unsuitable for a fully trained pilot such as he was, and that Bush would not be able to fulfill any of his remaining two years of flight obligation.

- But Bush pressed on with his transfer request nonetheless.

Bush’s transfer request to the 9921st was eventually denied by the Air Reserve Personnel Center in Denver, which meant he was still obligated to attend training sessions one weekend a month with his Texas unit in Houston.

- But Bush failed to attend weekend drills in May, June, July, August and September. He also failed to request permission to make up those days at the time.

According to Air Force regulations, “[a] member whose attendance record is poor must be closely monitored. When the unexcused absences reach one less than the maximum permitted [sic] he must be counseled and a record made of the counseling. If the member is unavailable he must be advised by personal letter.”

- But there is no record that Bush ever received such counseling, despite the fact that he missed drills for months on end.

Bush’s unit was obligated to report in writing to the Personnel Center at Randolph Air Force Base whenever a monthly review of records showed unsatisfactory participation for an officer.

- But his unit never reported Bush’s absenteeism to Randolph Air Force Base.

In July 1972 Bush failed to take a mandatory Guard physical exam, which is a serious offense for a Guard pilot. The move should have prompted the formation of a Flying Evaluation Board to investigation the circumstances surrounding Bush’s failure.

- But no such FEB was convened.

Once Bush was grounded for failing to take a physical, his commanders could have filed a report on why the suspension should be lifted.

- But Bush’s commanders made no such request.

On Sept. 15, 1972, Bush was ordered to report to Lt. Col. William Turnipseed, the deputy commander of the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group in Montgomery, Ala., to participate in training on the weekends of Oct. 7-8 and Nov. 4-5, 1972.

- But there’s no evidence Bush ever showed up on those dates. In 2000, Turnipseed told the Boston Globe that Bush did not report for duty. (A self-professed Bush supporter, Turnipseed has since backed off from his categorical claim.)

However, according to the White House-released pay records, which are unsigned, Bush was credited for serving in Montgomery on Oct. 28-29 and Nov. 11-14, 1972. Those makeup dates should have produced a paper trail, including Bush’s formal request as well as authorization and supervision documents.

- But no such documents exist, and the dates he was credited for do not match the dates when the Montgomery unit assembled for drills

- But he should have earned four points, one each for Thursday and Friday, two for Saturday.

Weekday training was the exception in the Guard. For example, from May 1968 to May 1972, when Bush was in good standing, he was not credited with attending a single weekday UTA.

- But after 1972, when Bush’s absenteeism accelerated, nearly half of his credited UTAs were for weekdays.

To maintain unit cohesiveness, the parameters for substitute service are tightly controlled; drills must be made up within 15 days immediately before, or 30 days immediately after, the originally scheduled drill, according to Guard regulations at the time.

- But more than half of the substitute service credits Bush received fell outside that clear time frame. In one case, he made up a drill nine weeks later.

On Sept. 29, 1972, Bush was formally grounded for failing to take a flight physical. The letter, written by Maj. Gen. Francis Greenlief, chief of the National Guard Bureau, ordered Bush to acknowledge in writing that he had received word of his grounding.

- But no such written acknowledgment exists. In 2000, Bush spokesman Dan Bartlett told the Boston Globe that Bush couldn’t remember if he’d ever been grounded.

Bartlett also told the Boston Globe that Bush didn’t undergo a physical while in Alabama because his family doctor was in Houston.

- But only Air Force flight surgeons can give flight physicals to pilots.

Guard members are required to take a physical exam every 12 months.

- But Bush’s last Guard physical was in May 1971. Bush was formally discharged from the service in November 1974, which means he went without a required physical for 42 months.

Bush’s unsatisfactory participation in the fall of 1972 should have prompted the Texas Air National Guard to write to his local draft board and inform the board that Bush had become eligible for the draft. Guard units across the country contacted draft boards every Sept. 15 to update them on the status of local Guard members. Bush’s absenteeism should have prompted what’s known as a DD Form 44, “Record of Military Status of Registrant.”

- But there is no record of any such document having been sent to Bush’s draft board in Houston.

Records released by the White House note that Bush received a military dental exam in Alabama on Jan. 6, 1973.

- But Bush’s request to serve in Alabama covered only September, October and November 1972. Why he would still be serving in Alabama months after that remains unclear.

Each of Bush’s numerous substitute service requests should have formed a lengthy paper trail consisting of AF Form 40a’s, with the name of the officer who authorized the training in advance, the signature of the officer who supervised the training and Bush’s own signature.

- But no such documents exist.

During his last year with the Texas Air National Guard, Bush missed nearly two-thirds of his mandatory UTAs and made up some of them with substitute service. Guard regulations allowed substitute service only in circumstances that are “beyond the control” of the Guard member.

- But neither Bush nor the Texas Air National Guard has ever explained what the uncontrollable circumstances were that forced him to miss the majority of his assigned drills in his last year.

Bush supposedly returned to his Houston unit in April 1973 and served two days.

- But at the end of April, when Bush’s Texas commanders had to rate him for their annual report, they wrote that they could not do so: “Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of this report.”

On June 29, 1973, the Air Reserve Personnel Center in Denver instructed Bush’s commanders to get additional information from his Alabama unit, where he had supposedly been training, in order to better evaluate Bush’s duty. The ARPC gave Texas a deadline of Aug. 6 to get the information.

- But Bush’s commanders ignored the request.

Bush was credited for attending four days of UTAs with his Texas unit July 16-19, 1973. That was good for eight crucial points.

- But that’s not possible. Guard units hold only two UTAs each month — one on a Saturday and one on a Sunday. Although Bush may well have made up four days, they should not all have been counted as UTAs, since they occur just twice a month. The other days are known as “Appropriate Duty,” or APDY.

On July 30, 1973, Bush, preparing to attend Harvard Business School, signed a statement acknowledging it was his responsibility to find another unit in which to serve out the remaining nine months of his commitment.

- But Bush never contacted another unit in Massachusetts in which to fulfill his obligation.

Despite the laundry list of Guard discrepancies, Bush, when asked about his service this weekend, insisted, “I did everything [my superiors] asked me to do.”

One blog post, by Dan Gillmor, and one comment, by one of his readers. It’s all there.

From Gillmor’s blog:

Frank Rich (NY Times): This Time Bill O’Reilly Got It Right. No matter how long the overlap between Mr. Carville and Mr. Begala’s TV and campaign roles, that brand and CNN itself are now as inextricably bound to the Democrats as Fox is to the Republicans.

The network has succeeded in an impossible feat — ceding Mr. O’Reilly the moral high ground. The Bush campaign doesn’t have to enlist Fox hosts for its staff since they’re willing to whore for it without even being asked.

Comments

So, the next time the Merc runs an op-ed piece from Alexander Cockburn, it magically turns into “socialist fishwrap”?

The problem with Faux News isn’t that it has openly-partisan talk show hosts. It’s that management has blurred (some would say “erased”) the line between “news” and “commentary”.

Frankly, Faux isn’t even CNN’s real competition anymore: that role belongs to Google News, which provides the same up-to-the-minute information, with an even wider range of perspectives. Anyplace you have access to a computer.

If it remains in its current form, CNN is probably doomed to becoming a sort of “Newzak” for use in airport waiting rooms and similar PC-less venues.

VoIP Uber Alles …

Doc Searls points us to Om Malik’s publishing of an essay by a colleague of Malik’s. Doc suggests this essay may be the most important piece ever written on the history, current state and eventual future of VoIP as one of the fundamental components of communication.

An excerpt:

Advances in communication from writing and paper to the printing press, telegraph, and telephone shape human progress. Some might have viewed VoIP as an interesting toy in 1995, but no one presently doubts it will dominate the communication future.

The economies of scale associated with growing customer awareness and competition will produce a Moores Law like virtuous cycle of communication innovation.

The full essay is here.

I have often wondered why blogging hasn’t been adopted more readily in organizations and corporations … as have many others, and there are a plethoras of opinions readily available on the subject.

What that means to me … when so many people write about it … is that it is obvious that it would be useful. After all, it’s online conversation and would serve to advance projects, enhance the possibilities of innovation or responsiveness, and so on … just as real-life conversation does.

But then, as David Weinberger has famously said …. coonversation is only possible between equals … and in 99% of organizations, traditional hierarchy is alive, well and thriving.

Blogs are viewed suspiciously because they enable real, raw voice. It’s not obvious how they can be controlled in the same way that employees are controlled by the fear of performance reviews, or ostracization, or dismissal. Microsoft has many bloggers, and supposedly it has a corporate policy on same … Don’t Be Stupid - which makes all the sense in the world.

I’ve stated before that I believe that developing and using an active network of blogs in an organization would accomplish most, if not all, of the stated desirable results of many many dollars spent on leadership development and developing flexible, responsive, open, more motivating corporate cultures - rather than the current appetitie for “fit-in-or-fuck-off” cultures.

Suw Charman, Corante’s Strange Attractor, has some well-thought out words on the gradual evolution of the prcesses and real possibilities of blogging in corporate environments

Bloggers everywhere are commenting on the role of blogging in the CBS Memo Authenticity scandal.

Though no one yet knows the truth about the memos’ authenticity, or whether or not the memos’ appearance and subsequent unfolding of events was a master stroke by Karl (Lee Atwater’s progeny) Rove, it’s clear that blogging about it has intensified the issue, and brought significant pressure to bear on Dan Rather and CBS.

Dan Gillmor has outlined the issue nicely in a post titled “Media, Blogs, Truth and Consequences”.

Check it out.

… is tracking 3,939,235 blogs as of noon Pacific Daylight Time.

I’m posting to this just to see how long it will take to hit 4,000,000 blogs.

Shall we start a pool ?

I’ll guess Thursday morning, September 23, 2004

Update

32 hours later … 9.00 p.m. Sunday, September 19, 2004

13,000 new blogs being tracked by Technorati

Update

27 more hours later … Midnight Monday, September 20, 2004

3,964, 981 almost 13,000 more new blogs

Update

22 hours later …. 11.00 p.m. Tuesday, September 21, 2004

3,977,376 12,395 more new blogs

Final Update

8.00 a.m Friday, Sept. 24 2004 4,001,612

Via Smirking Chimp, here’s a verbatim extract from George Bush the First speaking to a group of soldiers:

Speech to Gulf War Veterans in 1999, where Poppy said,

“Had we gone into Baghdad — we could have done it, you guys could have done it, you could have been there in 48 hours — and then what? Which sergeant, which private, whose life would be at stake in perhaps a fruitless hunt in an urban guerilla war to find the most-secure dictator in the world?

Whose life would be on my hands as the commander-in-chief because I, unilaterally, went beyond the international law, went beyond the stated mission, and said we’re going to show our macho? We’re going into Baghdad.

We’re going to be an occupying power — America in an Arab land — with no allies at our side. It would have been disastrous.”

What do you think - have they chatted since then ?

Doc Searls gives us a nifty new perspective on all of this interconnected, web-like activity that we’ve now been experiencing for several years.

He notes that this is the fifth anniversary of the imminent publication of The Cluetrain Manifesto … it’s birth, if you will.

That was five years ago.

This fall the Cluetrain is going to kindergarten ;-)
Wonder what it will look like, and what we’ll all be doing, when it goes into the first year of high school as an adolescent ?

It’s Official !

Today, Thursday, September 16, 2004 marks our official start to the beta release of Qumana.

Qumana is a microcontent assembly and publishing application that features three integrated capabilities that are extremely useful to all people who create and author content for publication to blogs, web sites, email, and documents.

Capability # 1 … Drag n’ Drop

Qumana uses sophisticated drag n’ drop capabilities, along with a funky and easy-to-use DropPad that sits on your browser in an extremely inobtrusive manner … the DropPad is essentially transparent (thanks for this nifty little feature, Graham). A user can surf and research all day long, or for whatever period of time they wish, dragging and dropping any and all content they find interesting or useful into the DropPad. users can also drag n’ drop links, files, large blocks of text, pictures, audio and video files … almost anything.

Capability # 2 … Assemble, Shape, Edit

Then, the user can open up the Workpad and see what they’ve collected, move it around, re-arrange it, delete what is no longer interesting or relevant, and so on. Then, either Save the content as a Folder in the Library, to be worked upon later, or click on Publish …. to create a post or a document while in the flow of working on an idea and its expression.

Up comes a full-featured WYSIWYG html Editor, so that the user can add text, change fonts, add links, upload filesto finish things off so that what will be published looks professional (well, it looks however you, the user, wants it to look, within the full range of WYSIWYG capabilities). And, there’s Spell-check !

Additionally, right-clicking on any item and scrolling down to and clicking on Properties allows the user to create a significant range of both structured and user-defined metadata (key words, categories, comments, etc.)

Capability # 3 … Post-to-”Anywhere”

If the user is blogging, the stitched-together final-edit content is posted to whatever blog you’ve directed the application to publish to. You can have one, two or many different blog settings loaded in, so that you can post the content, or parts of it, to multiple blogs.

Currently, the user can also Save the content that is being kept to HTML or to RTF … in either case, the content can be opened up in MS Word and can then be saved and/or printed as a Word document. Post to email and Save as PDF are on the itinerary for the next few weeks.

We welcome serious beta testers who will put the application thorugh it’s paces, applying the “use it, abuse it, see if we don’t wan to lose it” methodology … try to break it, tell us what could function more smoothly, or help us understand features that we haven’t yet designed and built that will make this one kick-ass product !

The download is over at www.qumana.com

Welcome to the beta release of Qumana …. keeping you posted by thinking and linking at the speed of reading

3D Workplaces … ?

Via Dave Winers’ Scripting.com

Don Park says the techniques of 3D games can replace the desktop metaphor. I agree. I remember thinking the same thing the first time I played a 3D game

Of course the workplace is (mostly) 3D already … real people working in real 3D cubicles, behind real 3D computers, etc.

I remember speaking at an eLearning conference 3 and a half years ago in Whistler, BC, and suggesting that (eventually) the video game idiom would find its way, massively, into the workplace.

I know, from various management books, that Electronic Arts and Cisco have been exploring this area for a while.

Game on !

Just one question …

Here.

Making History ?

Juan Cole’s Informed Comment is a blog that I assume people at Al Jazeera and other places with influence in Iraq read. I think he’s right about the possibility of moving the Iraqi populace with respect to whatever actions eventually occur with this hostage-taking.

Maybe a blog will play a key role in the outcomes of a flash-point event in an historic “war”.

Italian Hostages

Anne Aldridge writes from Italy:

Here for your readers is the site of the Italian pacifist organization whose two volunteers, Simona and Simona, were kidnaped yesterday. It has some English pages.

This is an opportunity for Al Jazira, Al arabiya or any other media to show their power to move Iraqi public opinion. These are two attractive young women that apparently have made a lot of friends in Baghdad; according to Radio Popolare this morning, they adored Baghdad: its ancient culture (Italians truly relate to people who appreciate ancient history) and sincere hospitality.

http://www.unponteper.it/index.php

Finally !

Today, August 31 marks the soft beta launch of an application a couple of colleagues and me have been working on for the past year and a half or so. Lots of work, almost all for free … learning how to be an entrepreneur.

It is basically a tool for gathering, assembling and publishing microcontent. We have been paying a lot of attention to what a lot of fairly advanced bloggers have been saying about what they want in terms of ease-of-use, WYSIWYG and other full-blown editing features, and both structured and user-defined metadata.

It has also been designed to be an “information pivot”, so to speak … one can gather, just by drag and drop, virtually any type of microcontent, including:

- text (from blogs and web sites and MS Word)

- pictures

- links

- audio files

- video files

The microcontent that is gathered is stitched together automatically in the sequence in which it was collected (the items can be moved around at will, or deleted or more can be added).

This assembled microcontent can be viewed in a Preview window as it is being gathered (or not - as you wish) and then “click” - the content appears in a full-blown WYSIWYG Editor, which includes spell-check ;-)
Customized style sheets can be built, that will appear in both the Preview window and the Editor (we will be building a range of templates, for those who are technically challenged).

The content can be published from the Editor to a range of blogs via a pull-down menu. It can (at the moment) be saved to RTF or HTML. Within the next several weeks we will add publishing destinations such as email, RSS and Atom feeds, PDFs and (I hope) wikis. Eventually, we will also add integrated systems such as ERP, CRM and LMS systems to this list.

It is lightweight, robust and essentially bug-free, as far as we can tell.

If anyone out there is interested in being a beta tester/user, and I haven’t invited you, please let me know in my Comments section below.

Thanks to Chris Corrigan for passing me this article written by Ricardo Semler, CEO of Semco (a continuously innovative company in Brazil reknowned in strategy and organizational development circles for pushing the bounds of workplace democracy).

Semler wrote a book about his unusual and effective strategies and operational tactics titled “Maverick” many years ago, and several years ago wrote a piece on innovation and organic strategy for the Harvard Business Review. He seems to always use his company as the case study, and why not. They do great things.

I have always wondered why more companies didn’t adopt their own version of the Semco approach.

This excerpt from his new book “The Seven-Day Weekend” provides an interesting perspective on how to take risks, experiment and put the human enzme (Semler himself) to work in catalyzing interesting business opportunities. Giving up on the delusion of control is a central part of his argument

An excerpt:

But many entrepreneurs–be they leaders of great or small enterprises–can’t bring themselves to let go. They probably would have shown me the door, and turned away from a $65 million venture. I believe the obsession with control is a delusion and, increasingly, a fatal business error. The more we grab for it, the more it slips away, and ever more desperate measures are applied, spawning Enrons, WorldComs, and hosts of lower profile disasters. As the control mechanism grows harsher and harsher, what’s lost is the central purpose of the business, any business–a satisfying, worthwhile life for those involved and a reasonable reward for their investment and hard work. The seven-day weekend is Semco’s way of getting out of the control business and back to our central purpose.