January 27, 2005

You are currently browsing the daily archive for January 27, 2005.

New, integrated and sophisticated technologies are being developed and implemented – and the knowledge workers of tomorrow will be more interconnected than ever

 

According to the experts, Web 2.0 is on its way to the workplace soon – it’s an infrastructure that’s decentralized and more open than that which exists today. 

Remember Napster ?  The workplace versions exist and may be coming soon to a workplace near you.  Indeed, the wider conversation about blogs and the workplace is only growing, and acquiring useful examples.

Many forms of “smartware” are also on the runway, getting ready to take off.  New tools are absolutely essential to deal with the overload of information that already exists – and grows more daunting with each passing week.  This “smartware” will find its way into the workplace.

Smartware will either “dumb things down” (entering information, and the system does the rest), or “smarten things up” (helping people collaborate and create new knowledge).

Many of these tools will add capability and functionality to the continuing need for effective collaboration – and so will make collaboration more and more possible.

More technology-supported collaboration will in turn increase the need for effective leadership and coaching – champion-and-channel will become more necessary than ever.  The game will get sharper again.

Adapting to the new tools will require new forms of social interaction in the workplace.  As change keeps coming, and work activities become more interdependent, the required adaptation will become more social and cultural in nature.

 
 
Powered By Qumana

Yes, I’ve switched … to Firefox (when using my PC instead of my Mac)
 
It’s brilliant !  Testing the posting of .gifs grabbed off thepage in Firefox.
 
 
 
 
fox1.gif
 
 
Powered By Qumana

Kombinat !  combines sourcing/provenance, a comprehensive analysis of the blog/journalism credibility Smackdown at the Shorenstein, and a quizzical look at Hugh Hewitt’s place in the pantheon of web credibility.
 
All in one short post.  Peekaboo !
 
 
Hysterical Background on Sandhill
 
 
and Frank ask this question:
 
 
tag: webcred
 
 
 
Powered By Qumana

Poor Dave …

All together now … aaaww …

I mean … I’ve seen probably hundreds of posts on the blogs of many talented, skilled and grown-up, tech-oriented bloggers who have cited dave winer’s excellence in many ways, and acknowledged his key contributions and ongoing leadership in developing and growing the blogospher.

And … some days I’d swear he wants to be acknowedged as King of the Blogosphere or something … at least for a day. Kere’s his most recent plaintive nomination … of himself.

As other mommies would no doubt often say “gimme gimme never gets”.

From Scripting News today:

An award for myself 

Remember when you were a kid and your mom used to say dorky things about how it didn’t matter if other people liked you, because she liked you. You’d say “Oh mommmm, I know that.”

Anyway, I don’t get awards, but I wish I did. Given a chance I would certainly nominate this site for best technology in a weblog, if only for the cool Google-powered search, illustrated above in the post about Powazek. Did you know it uses the Google API in conjunction with the local content database to only give you the bits you’re looking for. It’s a big thing, and as far as I know, of all the millions of weblogs they’re tracking at Technorati (thanks to weblogs.com, by the way), this is the only one that has such a cool search command.

Let’s see, in addition to Best Technology in a Weblog, I would also give this site an award for Best Weblog, hands-down, and certainly put it in contention for Best Tech Weblog, and Best New Meme (podcasting).

The funny thing is, if you live long enough the dorky things that Mom used to say start meaning more.

Comment # 7 …

…  at a Comments shindig over at Allied, created by Jeneane’s noting that there’s more than one type of conversational process and culture going on in the whole thing about being a social animal online …
 
 
#7 Jan 23 2005, 08:26 pm
 
 
Wandered onto this site from Dohiyi Mir.
 
Slightly OT, but if I may… How much of this blather over credibility and ethics and “stupid shit that exposes the speaker as a moron” has there been on this? I feel really strongly that this is a Rovarian attempt to take down the very thing he could not control during the last term, and that he will smear and blow smoke and crap all over the ‘blogosphere’ just to downgrade the truth which spreads like wildfire.
 
I was new about two years ago to the blogosphere. I was driven here by an anger that was not being addressed by the main stream news. I found a community that shared facts, referenced journalists’ reports from around the world, discussed events. The main focus was to hang on hard to the truth, and not be diverted nor distracted by what was going for ‘news’.
 
This whole thing about ethics is so silly. Most people who call themselves journalists today have been bought off, or have a bias so clearly observable you can tell immediately what ’side’ they are on. The journalists who remember what pursuing the truth entails stand head and shoulders above the rest, and are scarred and bloody from doing so.
 
In reading blogs, I have followed hundreds of them, pick a few to follow. If they quest for the truth, hold true to their ideals, are honest in their opinions and change stances as more information comes through, then I read them. I will verify information by comparing several different news sites and other blogs before I will decide on whether some action/event/fact is true.
 
So the idea that some ‘bloggers’ may not tell the truth is a fact. So what? It’s like being at a party and deciding who is a blowhard and who you would like to hang with for the evening. Intelligence, honesty, truth seeking, hopefully flexibility and humor. You can’t fake these.
 
ellroon
 
 
Powered By Qumana